On 11/23/2014 04:58 PM, midi-pascal wrote:
> Since I have a very good knowledge of the low level MIDI file structure,
> I would be willing to build either a stand alone program to convert from
> an mpp file to MIDI file or a plugin for lmms to do so.
> Is this pertinent?
> Any feedback is very we
On 11/18/2014 02:23 PM, Vesa wrote:
> Well, if you have old projects, you'll just have to finish them with 1.1
> or 1.2 and render them to wavs. Then publish them, forget about it, and
> make new music with 2.0.
If this is the current development team's outlook, I really think LMMS 2.x
needs to be
On 07/31/2014 05:10 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> I've filed an issue on Github: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1048
[earlier]
>> I'm going to try spotting the difference in project files before and
>> after rendering, because the problem persists in certain projects.
If you're having difficult
On 07/29/2014 05:23 AM, Vesa wrote:
> 1. Kickstarter campaign for a hired developer? Do a kickstarter to
> raise some funds, then use the money to hire a developer to help with
> the migration to a new core. Do we have enough of a userbase that this
> could be feasible?
Regardless of the size of t
On 03/21/2014 08:36 AM, Israel wrote:
> Is there a good reason why I should build a 64bit package? If 64bit
> wine can't handle VST (or much of anything) why even build a 64bit
> package?
What do you mean by "or much of anything"? I run 64-bit and rarely use
VSTs, so I didn't even notice they w
On 03/04/2014 09:35 PM, Vesa wrote:
> I think we should rather move to a model, where instead of one global
> time signature we could just allow setting a time signature for each
> pattern individually - you could mix in 5/8 patterns at the same time
> with 3/9 patterns, at the same time. This w
On 03/02/2014 02:24 PM, Vesa wrote:
[quoting Tres]
>> 3 words: User agent spoofing... 3 words: Nobody does that. :)
Well, you now have 3 counterexamples for your three words. I do it all the
time too, both on my desktop and on my phone, where too many sites still
embody this comic:
http://www.xk
On 02/23/14 15:54, Vesa wrote:
> Yes it was a linked image. Are you perhaps reading via some online
> mailing list reader?
Yeah, it's called "Mozilla Thunderbird". I have HTML disabled for security
reasons, as should everyone. I'm kind of ashamed that Sourceforge passes
HTML through intact.
> Her
On 02/22/2014 02:35 PM, Vesa wrote:
> So the end result is, here's the updated Bitinvader
>
>
>
I got no picture. Did you make an HTML post or something?
Rob
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Ta
Oops, sent from the wrong address this morning...
On 02/13/2014 10:26 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Can we discuss whether or not to ship at least one VST instrument with LMMS?
My (layman's) understanding is that the VST SDK is incompatible with the
GPL. I know that Wine is LGPL, so maybe because
On 02/13/2014 01:23 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> This means no VSTs that use the steinberg sdk (most likely all VSTs on the
> market) can be bundled, correct?
That's correct. They'd have to use a clean-room reimplementation of the VST
API, and I don't know of such a thing.
However, a secondary p
On 02/04/2014 06:06 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 12:39 AM, Sam Duff wrote:
>> True dat. It's decided then. We proceed to use Unity as the new name
> Yes, because there are not enough programs named "Unity" on the market!
> We need to fix this deficiency! =D
I think I can only get behind this i
On 02/04/2014 08:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Lean Mean Music Studio :D LOVE IT!!!
I love it too, but I think it would actually be more applicable to more
limited projects such as Qtractor that rely on external programs for
everything from audio routing to sound generation. LMMS takes 10-12 s
On 02/03/2014 11:46 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> How about Liquid Music Magic.
On the plus side, the Liquid Audio trademark seems to have expired when the
company went under, so this name is probably non-infringing now.
On the minus side, it sounds like a Jon Anderson solo album title.
Rob
-
On 01/31/2014 12:02 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> In honor of our "honeycomb" logo/splash screen winner, what if LMMS were
> renamed: "Honeykomb"
Well, honeykomb.org is available (as makefreemusic.org already is). .com
and .net are both taken. The other issue is, the out-of-place K will make
it se
On 01/31/2014 10:36 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Ah, scratch that... Godaddy has it for auction, $277. Man their
> interface is misleading! :)
"whois makefreemusic.com" in the shell is less confusing.
On the plus side, it looks like the domain expires in March, so you (or
someone else) may be
On 01/29/2014 09:47 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I have hatched a very interesting idea. We can take lmms and put it on
> android and basicalyl have it connect to ones laptop via blue tooth and
> you can produce a song by controlling stuff via lmms for android, in
> otherwords like a tv remote
Let me start by saying I have zero legal background. However, I've been in
a band whose output was mostly cover songs, and we did look into our
distribution options. I also made and distributed a hack of a very popular
then-17-year-old video game in the late '90s; there was some fallout, and
after
On 01/23/2014 08:17 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> I feel "Owl City - Fireflies" is a fantastic candidate for
> consideration to LMMS sample projects and I feel I've made the case that
> it falls under the "fair use" clause. - Do others agree that it should
> be included? - If so, should we move for
Weird, I have messages from days ago just coming through now. Anyway,
On 01/16/2014 03:23 AM, Vesa wrote:
>> What I am trying to say is that we can do somethign similar where we
>> can allow people to compose music and make changes to a track on the
>> mobile device and it will appear in lmms. [
On 01/17/2014 02:29 AM, Vesa wrote:
> I'm not entirely familiar with CSound or the others, but it seems fairly
> complex with a high learning curve - it has an entire programming
> language for sound generation, and also it kind of seems like it would
> be hard to integrate well with LMMS. I'd like
On 01/16/2014 02:09 AM, Vesa wrote:
> The idea is: a declarative interpreted modular synthesis plugin
> framework (DIMSPF for short).
It kind of sounds like you're looking for something like pd or csound. I
like the idea because, as I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I used to
love Buzz on W
On 01/14/2014 12:13 PM, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> Distros like KXStudio and AVLinux remove most
> of the pain of getting JACK configured, should that be an issue.
"Just wipe your computer and use a different distro so that you'll like my
pet program more!" Yeah, I'll get right on that.
> aware that
On 01/14/2014 05:45 AM, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> seems most people on this list are Linux users so I don't understand why
> they aren't already using qtractor, presuming they're aware of it?
1. I can build entire songs in LMMS project files, which I can then email
to other people or backup safely wi
On 01/12/2014 09:38 AM, johanne...@mailueberfall.de wrote:
> They are usable as very reduced forums, but they are not. Tons of
> features are missing, like e.g. editing a forum (I guess).
The inability to revise history is another point in favor of mailing lists,
as far as I'm concerned. Eventual
On 01/12/2014 02:15 AM, Gurjot Singh wrote:
>> * If you have 20 new mails in a thread, you have to click 20 times.
> Actually no. I use gmail client for my mails. I've created a filter for
> lmms-devel, ...
Which brings me to another point in favor of mailing lists that I forgot to
include in my
On 01/10/2014 09:02 AM, Johannes Lorenz wrote:
> Pro (Forum):
> * Subforums
> * More functionality for searching
> * More features: HTML, Images/Sounds, Thanks-Buttons etc.
> * No spam anymore. I got 100 mails today, none of them interested me. In a
> forum, you can set notifications to threads yo
On 01/09/2014 09:05 AM, Tobiasz Karoñ wrote:
> *Jonathan *has offered a section on his forums - maybe we should go for it
> and start planning and discussing there? It'll prevent the ideas from
> disappearing into the void...
Your choice of words here is kind of funny, since Sourceforge mailing li
On 2013-06-13 07:09, musikBear wrote:
> You mean this is aimed at individuel users? I felt it was the forum as such.
> I says 'Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted
> forever' -not 'users'
> http://old.nabble.com/forum/
> is where i read the threads
> Where do you read the
On 01/14/2013 02:51 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> as you all know, we want to change at least the program logo in the
> future. There were various proposals in the past which I'd like to
> summarize. The three logos attached were the most complete drafts I
> found in my inbox. If I forgot somebody's
On 10/22/2012 06:48 AM, Tobiasz Karoñ wrote:
> I think it might be usefull to export mixer tracks to WAVs and mix them in
> Ardour later.
> Anybody thinking about this?
Yeah, the way I've done it in the past has been to solo each track, one by one,
and render to a WAV file for each one.
I'd lov
On 03/17/2012 04:55 PM, Ben wrote:
>>The trouble is that it's cliche' enough that something very similar has
>> probably been used somewhere else
>
> Don't know if you're familiar with it, but TinEye is *frighteningly*
> good at finding images similar to something one uploads.
In this case, though
32 matches
Mail list logo
