Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-20 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> was planning to send a patch after 1.1 was released. 1.2 is in active development, just submit to master. No need to wait for the release of 1.1. :) - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 19/12/2014 20:19, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > >> On 12/19/2

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-20 Thread Shane Ambler
On 19/12/2014 20:19, Raine M. Ekman wrote: >> On 12/19/2014 04:10 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Freewheeling should for the most part be quite like rendering, except > that any JACK MIDI ports should be left enabled. > > But hey, there is no JACK MIDI support yet! Maybe add that to the list? I ha

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-19 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Thanks for the quick feedback guys. Consolidated. #1467 I decided to put the ALSA-JACK one in there too to tidy things up a bit more... @unfa feel free to reopen that on its own if you determine its is still valid and unrelated to our internal JACK supp

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-19 Thread Vesa
On 12/19/2014 11:49 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > No comment on in/outputs. Transport support is probably not a huge > thing to add when the single tempo track changes are done, locating to > an absolute time should be possible. Yep. > Locating to bar/beat/tick might > be a bit trickier wit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-19 Thread Raine M. Ekman
> On 12/19/2014 04:10 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Does anyone object to me wrapping the open bugs into a single bug > report so that they can be addressed as a WIP when the opportunity arises? > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/276 Maybe not a JACK problem: "I changed to JACK and re-tried. T

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-18 Thread Vesa
On 12/19/2014 04:10 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > "Better JACK support" seems to be a common theme historically for > LMMS, yet we have several specific open bug reports around it which > have gotten very little attention. > > Does anyone object to me wrapping the open bugs into a single bug > repo

[LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

2014-12-18 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
"Better JACK support" seems to be a common theme historically for LMMS, yet we have several specific open bug reports around it which have gotten very little attention. Does anyone object to me wrapping the open bugs into a single bug report so that they can be addressed as a WIP when the opportun