Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Thats great news. If you need a wiki account, contact Lukas W ( lukas...@gmail.com) he'll provide you with one. Best regards, Uroš On 30 June 2014 15:37, Ian Sannar wrote: > I can do some work on the Zyn page. > -- Ope

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I can do some work on the Zyn page. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and s

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

im on the sfsr, but has been writing 'what is this' (wit) sentences for a coupl of days, now (not done by far) writing wit's is another job that need to be done! Make /sure/ you follow the plan here: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/896 No need to do the the job 'trice' (if you not on github, ma

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Here are some of the pages that need attention: http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/SFXR http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/SID http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/VeSTige http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Vibed http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/ZynAddSubFX

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I've suddenly discovered my old wiki login still works. I should probably do stuff (and not just complain about Pulse) ... is there a to-do list up anywhere? On 30 June 2014 00:43, Ian Sannar wrote: > I do tutorials on LMMS, I could possible help with the Using LMMS section. > > -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I do tutorials on LMMS, I could possible help with the Using LMMS section. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

When I got some time, I decided to replace all the left over old pictures and finally finish the Manual (1.0 was released over 3 months ago and the manual still isn't ready). I can now say that The "Tutorial" and "Manual" sections of http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/1.0:Manual are fully d

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Thanks for the mail Stian! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p9306.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- HPCC Sy

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > I still don't think you have explained *how* he can upload it. correct, so *how* ? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p9284.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Stian, is it better now? 2014-06-19 20:53 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > Almost Lucas. The duplication worked, but the code for the content box > worked > opposite? I think this looks bad, not sure if it is worse than before... > > < > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/fil

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I still don't think you have explained *how* he can upload it. If he can't, then he has no choice but to upload it to a hosting service and put FIXME's in the article for someone with proper access to fix. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Stian Jørgensrud

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

NO NO NO! Diizy never meant to say that. He meant that you could upload it directly to the wiki, not directly into an article. He meant that you don't need to upload it to any other site, you can upload it to the LMMS wiki, it hosts the images itself. musikbear wrote > A different though perhaps

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

A different though perhaps related 'issue' I wanted to add a picture to an article i wrote. I cant find any option for that - I believed it was diiz who said that it was possibele to upload pics /directly/ to the wiki now - (So my wish for a central image-repositary, was obsolte) Is that also an /a

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Almost Lucas. The duplication worked, but the code for the content box worked opposite? I think this looks bad, not sure if it is worse than before... > Lukas W > > Oh sorry, I should have known. I can't figure out

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Done. 2014-05-30 16:37 GMT+02:00 Lukas W. : > Oh sorry, I should have known. I can't figure out how to make you an > admin, so I'll edit the CSS myself now. Give me a minute. > > > 2014-05-29 21:23 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > > I could have added the CSS, if I were an admin I can't edit t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Oh sorry, I should have known. I can't figure out how to make you an admin, so I'll edit the CSS myself now. Give me a minute. 2014-05-29 21:23 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > I could have added the CSS, if I were an admin I can't edit that page. > > < > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.99

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I could have added the CSS, if I were an admin I can't edit that page. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p9069.html

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

The new sections thing: You could fix that with a `clear: left`. If you want the contents boxes to allow text next to them, make them float elements `float: left`. You can add CSS here: http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/MediaWiki:Common.css 2014-05-28 23:27 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud :

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Something is rotten in the wiki. New sections don't start all the way to the left, and the content boxes don't allow text on its sides. I was thinking this has something to do with wiki settings for the admins. @Lucas W

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Stian Jørgensrud wrote > ..Therefore I see no point in promoting the wiki right now, at least not > to write articles. agreed. Still god work, getting this so far! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p9042.html Sent fro

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Heh, I didn't finish my last post :/ Registration isn't fixed, and the poor fellow who said he would do it was Lucas. Therefore I see no point in promoting the wiki right now, at least not to write articles. And how would it act as an archive, or how would it not act as an archive? -- View thi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > I'm not sure this is worthy of its own Facebook newsfeed entry. its more like a 'sneaky' plea for peeps to /make /new pages in the wiki, not the feature itself, but a heads-up, for no excuse not to contribute to it :p (he says knowing he havent added anything for years

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Out of curiosity could the 0.4 wiki taht we have serve as an archive, as well as historical purposes for the project? On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > To be honest, there isn't so much work "porting" the articles to 1.X > pages. I > could do that rather fast, but I am al

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

To be honest, there isn't so much work "porting" the articles to 1.X pages. I could do that rather fast, but I am also uploading new images, reformatting articles and updating the articles so they can be used for 1.X. Most of them needs to be filled out after that, though. And no one, it is the po

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

On May 26, 2014 9:10 AM, "musikbear" wrote: > > Great work! So it is now possibel to find a page in 0.4 wiki, copy it to the > 1.x wiki, and edit that new page in the 1.x wiki- Thats great- You could > post a note on the facebook-page? I'm not sure this is worthy of its own Facebook newsfeed entr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Great work! So it is now possibel to find a page in 0.4 wiki, copy it to the 1.x wiki, and edit that new page in the 1.x wiki- Thats great- You could post a note on the facebook-page? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

The extension is installed now. You can copy pages either by visiting http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Special:Duplicator or by visiting an existing site and clicking the "Duplicate this page" link in the toolbox on the left. 2014-05-24 22:03 GMT+02:00 Lukas W. : > Good :) > I'll see i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Good :) I'll see if I can install the Duplicator extension. 2014-05-24 21:20 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > I already did that yesterday to all the 1.0 copy/paste articles so far, you > see! > > > Lukas W. wrote > > You'd have start over again either way I guess. If it's too much, you > > could

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I already did that yesterday to all the 1.0 copy/paste articles so far, you see! Lukas W. wrote > You'd have start over again either way I guess. If it's too much, you > could > just include a note like "based on blabla(old version)", like you > suggested > earlier. > > > 2014-05-24 19:25 GMT+0

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

You'd have start over again either way I guess. If it's too much, you could just include a note like "based on blabla(old version)", like you suggested earlier. 2014-05-24 19:25 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > Install it please! > > I have already started... I could copy the new pages into the ol

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Install it please! I have already started... I could copy the new pages into the old again... Hmmm. Tres advised to keep the old pages, and the 0.3 pages have also been kept, so I'll continue the road of making new pages. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

It's not that bad really. It's perfectly fine to edit the old pages. By the way, I don't really see a point in keeping the old pages, the history, ergo the old version, is kept either way. If you want to copy a page, you should copy the history with it, there are tools that do exactly that: http://

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

It is quite ironic how easy it is to modify many lines of GPL source code yet how difficult it is to document that very same code into a wiki format. :) -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For F

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Oh fuck. You were sadly right. Attribution must be given, and we can't even licence these new pages different either if we use the old ones as references. What a licence hell we trapped ourself into just for the writing part. I guess I must provide a link to the history page of the old pages. Luk

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

arhh copyrighties... do *we* really have to go -there-, in respect to the community-help? /A simple disclaimer in the sign-up-to-wiki.. wouldent that do the trick?/ I cant see any problems for one public lmms wiki using pages from another public lmms wiki -Its not like someone copies pages from

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Yes, that's the point. It's quite the same as on Wikipedia. You're not allowed to copy text from Wikipedia without attribution either. Most of Wikipedia's text is licensed under CC-BY-SA. 2014-05-22 16:44 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > Uhm, I thought this wiki worked in the same way as wikipedia?

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Ouch. So far this have happened a lot, if not only, in Opera browser. Hope not many use that browser then... -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/W

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Uhm, I thought this wiki worked in the same way as wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights How can you even edit an article if it is copyrighted? I don't understand at all that the authors have any rights on anything in a free wiki. I can understand that it could be useful to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

2014-05-21 21:43 GMT+02:00 Stian Jørgensrud : > Don't overwrite old articles! They should be copy-pasted and modified on > new > sites here > No, they should not just be copy-pasted! By doing this, you remove the history of an article and thus the information about who wrote it. You infringe the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Don't overwrite old articles! They should be copy-pasted and modified on new sites here: http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/1.0:Manual I just looked into tagging pages as old. Adding __NOINDEX__ in the start of a page should perhaps keep it from showing up in the search. I'll look more int

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

all pages should be tagged accordingly even if they need to just be updated. One great example would be the community help wiki of ubuntu. I am not saying create a pdf. Once a page is obsolete it should be tagged as so. saying this page is obsolete and the version its meant for is no longer support

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

On 05/20/2014 07:09 PM, musikbear wrote: > Imo a lot in the current pages are still valid, and 'just' need 'some' > ajustments. + new imagery! -i have already thrown my 10 cent there, buuut a > good thing should be repeated :p :Central ImageDB! > > You can already upload images directly on the wi

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Jonathan Aquilina wrote > Cant they just be tagged as outdated or something of the sort? That way we > dont need to delete them. that is how the ubuntu community help wiki does > it. Build a static pdf and keep that as history-reference? I believe tools exists for that op?? But its more like -who

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I maintain a wiki for another project and have found some benefit in keeping the old pages around for aforementioned reasons, but if this is done, it is very important to mark as old and link to the new pages. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Jonathan Aquil

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Cant they just be tagged as outdated or something of the sort? That way we dont need to delete them. that is how the ubuntu community help wiki does it. On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > I don't want to make a difference on 1.0, 1.1 or any 1.X and perhaps not on > any fu

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I don't want to make a difference on 1.0, 1.1 or any 1.X and perhaps not on any future LMMS versions unless there is a huge difference like there was from 0.4 to 1.0. I agree that there perhaps aren't any reasons to keep the old pages, no other than for fun and history. If it is a way to keep them

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Stian Jørgensrud wrote > Here are the Opulenz page: > http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Opulenz Very nice. informative and well explained! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p8848.html Sent from the lmms-deve

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

On 05/15/2014 11:21 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > I have decided not to make special pages for 1.0 instruments. So 0.4 > instruments on the wiki will change, however most (all?) of the instruments > have just added functionality, so the guide still applies for 0.4. This also > means links will be b

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I have decided not to make special pages for 1.0 instruments. So 0.4 instruments on the wiki will change, however most (all?) of the instruments have just added functionality, so the guide still applies for 0.4. This also means links will be broken and wrong in the 0.4 manual, but as the pages foll

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I think you are right in that I should use LMMS users for wiki mails. Going to do that from now on, so people who wan to know what is happening on the wiki must subscribe to the user list. Here are the Opulenz page: http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Opulenz I must reconsider the 1.0 instr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Citerar Stian Jørgensrud : > If you want to write articles, click edit on the link above and copy the > exact name of the article you want to write. Search for it and then click > create. If you aren't registered reply to this message. A lot, if not most > of the text, can be copied over from the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

First Stian !Great job! - ya i did write articles, first as lmmscomp and later misikbear. But all in all i never found any ruleset so for if there are rules at all... Stian Jørgensrud wrote I felt ..no none - at least none that anyone stuck too :p -And perhaps that also was a part of the wiki..

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

I have now created the content page of 1.0 wiki by copy over the text from 0.4. http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/1.0:Manual It is not linked to anything yet, as it links to almost no articles. When some articles have been written/updated I will link it on the main page. If you want to wr

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

IIRC, It was "raindropsfromthesky" who wrote the manual (easy to confuse). -- "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unpar

Re: [LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

Citerar Stian Jørgensrud : > LMMS has its own wiki! http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > As a matter of fact it also have it's own manual in pdf format, which I > currently consider better as the wiki > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/UserManual/ This was created by >

[LMMS-devel] Wiki revival

LMMS has its own wiki! http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page As a matter of fact it also have it's own manual in pdf format, which I currently consider better as the wiki https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/UserManual/ This was created by Raine if I am correctly. The wiki an