Hi Maxim,
I will send another patch to resolve the hash collision issue.
BTW: did you received my resend v8, this time is TO: lng-odp@ lists.linaro.org?
I received it but not see on patch list.
Thanks,
Forrest
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxim Uvarov
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
Bill Fischofer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Merged,
Maxim.
On 08/24/16 19:17, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Barry Spinney wrote:
Both odp_pkt_queue.c and odp_traffic_mngr.c has similar bugs where
an array was malloc'd but the valid indicies run from 1 to the number
of entries malloc'd.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Bill Fischofer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2449
Bill Fischofer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> On 08/25/16 00:34, Anders Roxell wrote:
>
>> +#include
>
> >why do we include an internal header file?
> >
>>> >
>>> >because we need access to classifier bits, that is why this test is
>>> under
On 08/25/16 04:53, forrest.shi wrote:
Hi Maxim,
I CCed lng-odp@lists.linaro.org, but not show on
http://patches.opendataplane.org/project/lng-odp/list/
Might me list can not be in CC. Does hash collistion needs to be
resolved before inclusion?
Maxim.
I will resend it.
thanks,
On 08/25/16 00:34, Anders Roxell wrote:
+#include
> >why do we include an internal header file?
> >
>
>because we need access to classifier bits, that is why this test is under
>linux-generic.
OK, but do we really have to fiddle with internal classifier bits?
That is good question. For