On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Bill Fischofer > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Petri Savolainen <
>> petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Used the ring
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Petri Savolainen <
> petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Used the ring data structure to implement pool. Also
>> buffer structure was simplified to enable future driver
>>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Petri Savolainen <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Used the ring data structure to implement pool. Also
> buffer structure was simplified to enable future driver
> interface. Every buffer includes a packet header, so each
> buffer can be used as a packet head
allows pushes to a github clone of ODP to automatically trigger CI builds
Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes
---
.travis.yml | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .travis.yml
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
new
Use of a script in the autotools breaks github CI
Define the API version in configure and reuse it in the code
Benefits:
removes dependence on scripts to build
removes scripts and the make file from odp/scripts
removes generated .scmversion file
places api versioning right next to lib versioning
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Bala Manoharan
wrote:
> Regards,
> Bala
>
>
> On 21 October 2016 at 19:41, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Bala Manoharan <
> bala.manoha...@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
>
Regards,
Bala
On 21 October 2016 at 19:41, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Bala Manoharan
> wrote:
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bala
>>
>>
>> On 11 October 2016 at 09:15, Bill Fischofer
>>
On 3 October 2016 at 07:49, Matias Elo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
Reviewed-by: Mike Holmes
But I wonder if we should at some point ignore these in the root of
odp/example and odp/test to save repeating them ?
> ---
On 14 October 2016 at 07:51, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Make check should skip the test instead of failing it.
> Test splits RX and TX cores for packet processing. Core
> 0 bind to control thread. So running machine should have
> at least 2 worker threads which is not enough
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Bala Manoharan
wrote:
> Regards,
> Bala
>
>
> On 11 October 2016 at 09:15, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> > Introduce four new APIs that support efficient sharing of portions of
> > packets.
> >
> >
please review v3.
Maxim.
On 10/14/16 14:51, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Make check should skip the test instead of failing it.
Test splits RX and TX cores for packet processing. Core
0 bind to control thread. So running machine should have
at least 2 worker threads which is not enough on 1 and 2
cpus
On 10/20/16 14:52, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Maxim
Uvarov
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 3:49 PM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 02/10] linux-gen:
On 10/20/16 15:00, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Maxim
Uvarov
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 3:59 PM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 01/10] linux-gen:
Regards,
Bala
On 11 October 2016 at 09:15, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Introduce four new APIs that support efficient sharing of portions of
> packets.
>
> odp_packet_splice() creates a reference to a base packet by splicing a
> supplied header packet onto it at a
Merged both patches. Second one with my review only.
Maxim.
On 10/21/16 10:10, Kevin Wang wrote:
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang
On 21 October 2016 at 14:17, Yi He wrote:
Reply for Kevin Wang to add his review.
Best Regards, Yi
On 19 July 2016 at 02:29,
Does somebody review test this?
Maxim.
On 10/03/16 14:49, Matias Elo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matias Elo
---
example/l3fwd/.gitignore | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/example/l3fwd/.gitignore b/example/l3fwd/.gitignore
index 74e501f..3411830 100644
Merged,
Maxim.
On 10/21/16 11:21, Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Matias Elo
-Original Message-
From: Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 5:30 PM
To: bill.fischo...@linaro.org;
Used the ring data structure to implement pool. Also
buffer structure was simplified to enable future driver
interface. Every buffer includes a packet header, so each
buffer can be used as a packet head or segment. Segmentation
was disabled and segment size was fixed to a large number
(64kB) to
Removed odp_pool_to_entry(), which was a duplicate of
pool_entry_from_hdl(). Renamed odp_buf_to_hdr() to
buf_hdl_to_hdr(), which describes more accurately the internal
function. Inlined pool_entry(), pool_entry_from_hdl() and
buf_hdl_to_hdr(), which are used often and also outside of
pool.c.
Moved scheduler ring code into a new header file, so that
it can be used also in other parts of the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am | 1 +
platform/linux-generic/include/odp_ring_internal.h |
Improve performance by changing the first parameter of
buffer_alloc_multi() to pool pointer (from handle), to avoid
double lookup of the pool pointer. Pointer is available for
packet alloc calls already.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
Pool performance is optimized by using a ring as the global buffer storage.
IPC build is disabled, since it needs large modifications due to dependency to
pool internals. Old pool implementation was based on locks and linked list of
buffer headers. New implementation maintain a ring of buffer
Added multi-data versions of ring enqueue and dequeue operations.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
platform/linux-generic/include/odp_ring_internal.h | 65 ++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git
Use multi enq and deq operations to optimize global pool
access performance. Temporary uint32_t arrays are needed
since handles are pointer size variables.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c | 32
1
Added a macro to round up a value to the next power of two,
if it's not already a power of two. Also removed duplicated
code from the same file.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
.../linux-generic/include/odp_align_internal.h | 34 +-
1 file
In some error cases, netmap and dpdk pktios were calling
odp_packet_free_multi with zero packets. Moved existing error
check to avoid a free call with zero packets.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c | 10 ++
IPC pktio implementation depends heavily on pool internals. It's
build is disabled due to pool re-implementation. IPC should be
re-implemented with a cleaner internal interface towards pool and
shm.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
Hi,
I'll copy all API related comments into this response. Also I'd suggest that
the next version has all three API patches merged into one, since those touch
the same feature and lines in the file. Single patch is easier to review, find
later in commit log and handle during merge, etc. Now
Done.
On 21 October 2016 at 11:21, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Api-next needs a *quick* update to the latest level of master branch.
>
> There's now about 20 commit gap. For example, "Revert example: generator:
> actually use
Hi,
Api-next needs a *quick* update to the latest level of master branch.
There's now about 20 commit gap. For example, "Revert example: generator:
actually use specified default" is not yet on api-next, which breaks 'sudo make
check'. Also my pool optimizations cannot be rebased to api-next
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Matias Elo
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 5:30 PM
> To: bill.fischo...@linaro.org; Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang
On 21 October 2016 at 14:17, Yi He wrote:
> Reply for Kevin Wang to add his review.
>
> Best Regards, Yi
>
> On 19 July 2016 at 02:29, Brian Brooks wrote:
>
>> On 07/18 13:41:32, Mike Holmes wrote:
>> >
Reply for Kevin Wang to add his review.
Best Regards, Yi
On 19 July 2016 at 02:29, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 07/18 13:41:32, Mike Holmes wrote:
> > Is 10 milliseconds adequate for real work ?
> >
> > Should this be in some way calculated depending on the platform
> >
33 matches
Mail list logo