Re: [lng-odp] Regarding Chained Buffers and Crypto

2017-03-16 Thread Nanda Gopal
khil is working on this. > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Bala Manoharan <bala.manoha...@linaro.org > > wrote: > > On 16 March 2017 at 18:03, Nanda Gopal <nandana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Shally, > > > > Yes, I meant Segmented packets. > > >

Re: [lng-odp] Regarding Chained Buffers and Crypto

2017-03-16 Thread Nanda Gopal
wrote: > Have a question by chained , do you mean a "Segmented" packets? > > -Original Message- > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Bala > Manoharan > Sent: 16 March 2017 14:01 > To: Nanda Gopal <nandana...@gmail.com

Re: [lng-odp] Regarding Chained Buffers and Crypto

2017-03-16 Thread Nanda Gopal
oha...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 15 March 2017 at 18:42, Nanda Gopal <nandana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > *Hi,* > > > > *When we pass, odp_crypto_op_params_tparams to odp_crypto_operation > > > (), as per the documentation, if we set params-> out_p

[lng-odp] Regarding Chained Buffers and Crypto

2017-03-15 Thread Nanda Gopal
*Hi,* *When we pass, odp_crypto_op_params_tparams to odp_crypto_operation (), as per the documentation, if we set params-> out_pkt to INVALID, a new pkt would be created from the original pkt pool, data copied from original pkt and then passed on to DPDK. * *In our test case, we are