Patch reverted!
Maxim.
On 11/23/2015 14:20, Riku Voipio wrote:
On 20 November 2015 at 21:39, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
CC Riku if he is not in the list.
On 11/20/2015 22:16, Mike Holmes wrote:
I checked with Anders, my summary of the case.
Riku intended this patch would allow ODP to build on a p
On 20 November 2015 at 21:39, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> CC Riku if he is not in the list.
>
> On 11/20/2015 22:16, Mike Holmes wrote:
>>
>> I checked with Anders, my summary of the case.
>>
>> Riku intended this patch would allow ODP to build on a plain vanilla build
>> server and that goal is not met
CC Riku if he is not in the list.
On 11/20/2015 22:16, Mike Holmes wrote:
I checked with Anders, my summary of the case.
Riku intended this patch would allow ODP to build on a plain vanilla
build server and that goal is not met by this patch.
My understanding was that he wanted to just pre
I checked with Anders, my summary of the case.
Riku intended this patch would allow ODP to build on a plain vanilla build
server and that goal is not met by this patch.
On 20 November 2015 at 13:29, Anders Roxell
wrote:
> On 20 November 2015 at 19:23, Maxim Uvarov
> wrote:
> > On 11/20/2015 20
On 20 November 2015 at 19:23, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 20:07, Anders Roxell wrote:
>>
>> On 20 November 2015 at 15:45, Mike Holmes wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we have a review for this ?
>>
>> No because it didn't work due to we always depends on libssl-dev
>> (debian) or openssl-devel (fedora).
On 11/20/2015 20:07, Anders Roxell wrote:
On 20 November 2015 at 15:45, Mike Holmes wrote:
Do we have a review for this ?
No because it didn't work due to we always depends on libssl-dev
(debian) or openssl-devel (fedora).
This is the output if we have a buildserver that doesn't have any
pre-
On 20 November 2015 at 15:45, Mike Holmes wrote:
> Do we have a review for this ?
No because it didn't work due to we always depends on libssl-dev
(debian) or openssl-devel (fedora).
This is the output if we have a buildserver that doesn't have any
pre-installed packages except for
the standard,
Do we have a review for this ?
On 20 November 2015 at 09:39, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Merged,
> Maxim.
>
>
> On 11/19/2015 09:35, Riku Voipio wrote:
>
>> For CI loop, we have separate job to build binaries (build-package).
>> To make it possible to build source package without first installing
>> a
Merged,
Maxim.
On 11/19/2015 09:35, Riku Voipio wrote:
For CI loop, we have separate job to build binaries (build-package).
To make it possible to build source package without first installing
all build-deps, add a new optional parameter "source" to build
only source package.
Signed-off-by: Rik
For CI loop, we have separate job to build binaries (build-package).
To make it possible to build source package without first installing
all build-deps, add a new optional parameter "source" to build
only source package.
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio
---
scripts/builddeb | 7 ++-
1 file change
10 matches
Mail list logo
