Merged,
Maxim.
On 08/04/16 16:18, Mike Holmes wrote:
Set up the environment to allow calling the performance tests in process
mode as part of make check when enabled.
To run the tests use --enable-test-perf-proc
Initial patch using odp_scheduling as a proof
Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes
scho...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolainen@nokia-bell-
> > labs.com>; Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org>; LNG ODP Mailman List
> > <lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
> > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] test:linux-generi
y, August 09, 2016 8:33 PM
> To: Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolainen@nokia-bell-
> labs.com>; Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org>; LNG ODP Mailman List
> <lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
> Subjec
Thanks Brian
We have https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2457 for this issue to
continue the discussion.
This patch is reviewed and should go in so that CI can help find the next
thing we missed!
Mike
On 9 August 2016 at 13:33, Brian Brooks wrote:
> On 08/04
On 5 August 2016 at 19:41, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Maxim Uvarov
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/16 19:29, Mike Holmes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 August 2016 at 12:27, Maxim Uvarov >>
clear_sched_queues();
is missing just before destroying queues + fix form Bill with account
all term errors.
Maxim.
On 08/05/16 19:01, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 4 August 2016 at 11:26, Brian Brooks
On 08/05/16 19:29, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 5 August 2016 at 12:27, Maxim Uvarov > wrote:
clear_sched_queues();
is missing just before destroying queues + fix form Bill with
account all term errors.
Should this go on the
On 5 August 2016 at 12:27, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> clear_sched_queues();
>
> is missing just before destroying queues + fix form Bill with account all
> term errors.
Should this go on the bug ?
This this thread should be about this patch to enable process mode or it
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 11:26, Brian Brooks wrote:
>
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
> >
>
> Just wanted to follow up on this, this patch has also highlighted a bug in
>
On 4 August 2016 at 11:26, Brian Brooks wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
>
Just wanted to follow up on this, this patch has also highlighted a bug in
the original code and the thread below documents it, also a bug for it has
been created
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Brian Brooks
wrote:
> On 08/04 11:01:09, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Mike Holmes
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4 August 2016 at 11:47, Bill Fischofer
On 08/04 11:01:09, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 4 August 2016 at 11:47, Bill Fischofer
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Holmes
On 08/04/16 18:26, Brian Brooks wrote:
Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
On 08/04 09:18:14, Mike Holmes wrote:
+ret=0
+
+run()
+{
+ echo odp_scheduling_run_proc starts with $1 worker threads
+ echo =
+
+
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
>
>
> On 4 August 2016 at 11:47, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Holmes
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On my vanilla x86 I don't get any
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> On 08/04/16 18:26, Brian Brooks wrote:
>
>> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
>>
>> On 08/04 09:18:14, Mike Holmes wrote:
>>
>>> +ret=0
>>> +
>>> +run()
>>> +{
>>> + echo
On 4 August 2016 at 11:47, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Holmes
> wrote:
>
>> On my vanilla x86 I don't get any issues, keen to get this in and have
>> CI run it on lots of HW to see what happens, many of the
Quick update. I can repro this in v1.10.0.1 as well, however v1.10.0.0
seems good.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Holmes
> wrote:
>
>> On my vanilla x86 I don't get any issues,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
> On my vanilla x86 I don't get any issues, keen to get this in and have CI
> run it on lots of HW to see what happens, many of the other tests
> completely fail in process mode so we will expose a lot as we add them I
On my vanilla x86 I don't get any issues, keen to get this in and have CI
run it on lots of HW to see what happens, many of the other tests
completely fail in process mode so we will expose a lot as we add them I
think.
On 4 August 2016 at 11:33, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Brian Brooks
wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
>
> On 08/04 09:18:14, Mike Holmes wrote:
> > +ret=0
> > +
> > +run()
> > +{
> > + echo odp_scheduling_run_proc starts with $1 worker threads
> > + echo
Reviewed-by: Brian Brooks
On 08/04 09:18:14, Mike Holmes wrote:
> +ret=0
> +
> +run()
> +{
> + echo odp_scheduling_run_proc starts with $1 worker threads
> + echo =
> +
> +
Set up the environment to allow calling the performance tests in process
mode as part of make check when enabled.
To run the tests use --enable-test-perf-proc
Initial patch using odp_scheduling as a proof
Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes
---
configure.ac
22 matches
Mail list logo