[lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

2015-05-08 Thread Maxim Uvarov
v5: - accounted all comments for previous v4 review. - do not modify any api function, everything is done inside linux-generic. Please review that version. Thank you, Maxim. Maxim Uvarov (4): linux-generic: zero params for pool create api ipc: update ring with shm proc argument linux-

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

2015-05-12 Thread Maxim Uvarov
Ping. These patches need review. Thanks, Maxim. On 05/08/2015 12:57, Maxim Uvarov wrote: v5: - accounted all comments for previous v4 review. - do not modify any api function, everything is done inside linux-generic. Please review that version. Thank you, Maxim. Maxim Uvarov (4): li

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

2015-05-18 Thread Maxim Uvarov
If no more comments here can all reviewers add their review-by to that patchset? So that I can merge that patches. Thank you, Maxim. On 05/08/2015 12:57, Maxim Uvarov wrote: v5: - accounted all comments for previous v4 review. - do not modify any api function, everything is done inside li

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

2015-05-19 Thread Ciprian Barbu
It seems like there is still a discussion floating on patch 2, about including helper code in the linux-generic implementation. I will have a look at the other patches, but I think you need to solve the issue with the ring code before marking the patchset as ready to be merged. On Mon, May 18, 201

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

2015-05-20 Thread Maxim Uvarov
On 05/19/2015 17:37, Ciprian Barbu wrote: It seems like there is still a discussion floating on patch 2, about including helper code in the linux-generic implementation. I will have a look at the other patches, but I think you need to solve the issue with the ring code before marking the patchset