Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 05:51:52 2014
New Revision: 1567531
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567531
Log:
Uncomment out tests.
Accidentally nuked these in the prior commit. Sorry.
Modified:
incubator/log4cxx/trunk/src/test/cpp/helpers/cacheddateformattestcase.cpp
Modified:
incubator/log4
FYI, r1567530 tweaks the unit test harness to get e.what() when e
inherits from std::exception.
$ ./src/test/cpp/testsuite -v cacheddateformattestcase
...
Line -1: Unexpected std::exception: basic_string::compare
Line -1: Unexpected std::exception: basic_string::compare
Line -1: Unexpected std::ex
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 05:48:26 2014
New Revision: 1567530
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567530
Log:
Get e.what() on unexpected std::exception
Done towards chasing down cacheddateformattestcase problems.
Modified:
incubator/log4cxx/trunk/src/test/cpp/helpers/cacheddateformattestcase.cp
> I'm guessing the problem is in the test cases themselves-- I'll try to
> hook up a debugger to verify soon.
Finally got that debugger attached. The unexpected exceptions are
std::out_of_range, I think, from bad invocations of
std::string::compare. The backtraces all resemble
__cxa_throw () fr
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 05:15:58 2014
New Revision: 1567526
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567526
Log:
Remove +x on .{cpp,h,xml,properties} and witnesses
Modified:
incubator/log4cxx/trunk/src/ant/apr-build.xml (props changed)
incubator/log4cxx/trunk/src/ant/apr-util-build.xml (pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13898802#comment-13898802
]
Rhys Ulerich commented on LOGCXX-319:
-
r1567525 updates the examples and tests to matc
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 04:54:05 2014
New Revision: 1567525
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567525
Log:
LOG4CXX-319: Sprinkle semis in examples, tests
r1566619 updated logger.h to make LOG4CXX_INFO and friends
proper statements using the common do { stuff } while (0) idiom.
There were many pla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rhys Ulerich reopened LOGCXX-337:
-
The application of the patch broke compilation. I've tried repairing things in
r1567521, but someon
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 04:34:39 2014
New Revision: 1567521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567521
Log:
LOG4CXX-337 Attempt to get threadcxx.cpp compiling
r1566630 broke this compilation unit with mismatched
preprocessor directives and making Thread::join()
disappear. I suspect the problem wa
Hi all,
Please, please don't apply and commit patches from issues unless you
can confirm build correctly afterwards. The fixes for 320 and 305
have been invoked APR methods without the correct arguments and have
dropped down mismatched processor directives.
- Rhys
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 03:39:05 2014
New Revision: 1567513
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567513
Log:
LOG4CXX-305: undo initialize return change
Patch C applied as part of this issue changed the declared
return type of the static initialize method without changing
it in the implementation.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rhys Ulerich resolved LOGCXX-320.
-
Resolution: Fixed
r1567511 fixes that compilation issue, though several others remain atop that
Author: rhys
Date: Wed Feb 12 03:30:33 2014
New Revision: 1567511
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1567511
Log:
LOG4CXX-320: Correct apr_threadkey_private_delete
Change in r154 missed an argument to the method.
Modified:
incubator/log4cxx/trunk/src/main/cpp/aprinitializer.cpp
Modified: incub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rhys Ulerich reopened LOGCXX-320:
-
Assignee: Rhys Ulerich (was: Curt Arnold)
The patch applied in r154 included a bad call to
Guten Tag Florian Seydoux,
am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014 um 20:21 schrieben Sie:
> (not always aligned with the coding style of
> the rest of the lib).
I simply ignored that for now because I have the feeling the current
codebase isn't very consistent anyways and felt that getting
outstanding pat
On 10.02.2014 18:00, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> [...]
> So, how about freezing the trunk now
Good idea (and really good initiative).
I'm anyway a bit like Joseph - except that I'll need more time (~a week)
to close something.
To be honest, I've looked at some ticket with patch, but I wasn't reall
16 matches
Mail list logo
