Re: Help for the Log4cxx podling

2016-01-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > So even if we are to dead for the incubator, we are to alive for the > attic. If you can't make a release, you're dead enough for the Attic. Marvin Humphrey

Re: Help for the Log4cxx podling

2016-01-07 Thread Rhys Ulerich
> Or clone/fork it into Trafodion, if you need updates or continued maintenance. Any chance apr-util could pick up the torch? That would at least centralize it as anyone needing log4cxx needs apr-util. - Rhys

Re: Help for the Log4cxx podling

2016-01-07 Thread Greg Stein
Or clone/fork it into Trafodion, if you need updates or continued maintenance. Look at it as just another component (rather than a separate project). On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Roberta Marton, > am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 17:14 schrieben Sie: > >

Re: Help for the Log4cxx podling

2016-01-07 Thread Rhys Ulerich
> It doesn't look like there's other members still around I'm still lurking but have not touched the code for awhile. It is, and has been, unclear what needs to happen for a 0.11.0 release candidate [1]. Much of the problem is that there's no concensus on what build system should work. Autoto

Re: Help for the Log4cxx podling

2016-01-07 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Marvin Humphrey, am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 04:59 schrieben Sie: > The community has one active developer as far as I can tell, and at least he > is responding to user inquiries when they come in. But one developer does not > make an Apache community. Looking at the SVN history,