Hi Christian,
I'm taking a stab at getting an Ant- and/or Maven-based development
build going following either
https://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/building/maven.html or
https://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/building/ant.html. I'm rusty with
Ant, a noob at Maven, and I'm hitting some trouble.
I noti
Hi,
On 3 Jan 2014, at 4:42, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
I noticed there's a large block of dependencies in pom.xml that you
commented out in r1414037 (svn diff -c 1414037) but that the pom.xml
changes don't jive with the commit message (svn log -r 1414037) or the
patch attached to LOGCXX-404. Do you r
Guten Tag Christian Grobmeier,
am Freitag, 3. Januar 2014 um 11:36 schrieben Sie:
> The question actually is: what is the best way to build a multi-platform
> C++ project of that kind?
I have no experience, we do C++ and use log4cxx on Windows and with
Embarcaderos C++ Builder only. PCRE e.g. use
On 3 Jan 2014, at 11:55, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
Guten Tag Christian Grobmeier,
am Freitag, 3. Januar 2014 um 11:36 schrieben Sie:
The question actually is: what is the best way to build a
multi-platform
C++ project of that kind?
I have no experience, we do C++ and use log4cxx on Windows a
> I tend to believe that we should start to build log4cxx with Ant. My
feeling is that
> Maven was using Ant to build it. If the Ant stuff works, we could
renenable the Maven build for it,
> or leave it out.
Ah, sorry for crying wolf. I had hit a classpath issue with the cpptasks
JAR. I didn't rec
Hi everybody!
Just wanted to mention that... GNU autotools based build should remain
workable.
I have used log4cxx with autotools for 3 years at least. Last year it was
added to buildroot project which uses autotools also.
http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=6ebb930b694e97e5cf85a72495
Hi Roland,
> Just wanted to mention that... GNU autotools based build should remain
> workable.
Thanks for speaking up. I definitely plan to keep the Autotools alive
and well. I've been worrying about Ant/Maven since they're what
permits cross-platform. I personally plan to develop against
Aut
Hi Roland,
You may find these commits useful:
https://github.com/azbarcea/log4cxx/pull/1/files
These commits I remember Christian pushed them in the main/trunk. The
first, is similar to yours.
As a rule of thumb, we should not keep in the repo, generated files, even
if they are .h files. You end
Hi Rhys,
Is there a ticket for this? I'd like to help.
autotools
ant
maven
+1
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> > Just wanted to mention that... GNU autotools based build should remain
> > workable.
>
> Thanks for speaking up. I definitely p
> Is there a ticket for this? I'd like to help.
>
> autotools
> ant
> maven
Offhand, not that I'm aware of.
At least by 0.12.0, I'd planned to take a pass through JIRA for
tickets like LOG4CXX-385 (which Roland mentioned) to make Autotools
happy again out-of-the-box.
That particular issue is sim
On 3 Jan 2014, at 15:26, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
I tend to believe that we should start to build log4cxx with Ant. My
feeling is that
Maven was using Ant to build it. If the Ant stuff works, we could
renenable the Maven build for it,
or leave it out.
Ah, sorry for crying wolf. I had hit a clas
On 3 Jan 2014, at 18:31, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
Is there a ticket for this? I'd like to help.
autotools
ant
maven
Offhand, not that I'm aware of.
Just saying: I found creating a ticket for each "change" pretty helpful
when generating release notes.
Cheers
At least by 0.12.0, I'd planned
12 matches
Mail list logo
