RE: Installing log4cxx on Linux with Ant

2009-10-22 Thread Moshe Matitya
PM To: Log4CXX User Subject: Re: Installing log4cxx on Linux with Ant Does the install-sh script do what you want? Moshe Matitya wrote: I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to figure out how to install log4cxx on Linux with Ant. In the past, when installing log4cxx 0.9.7 on a Linux machine, I would b

Installing log4cxx on Linux with Ant

2009-10-22 Thread Moshe Matitya
I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to figure out how to install log4cxx on Linux with Ant. In the past, when installing log4cxx 0.9.7 on a Linux machine, I would build and install it using Make, as follows: To build it, I would run the following commands: autogen.sh co

RE: Can't build using Ant with MSVC 6.0

2008-09-03 Thread Moshe Matitya
d.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] [cc] aprutil-1.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 2 unresolved externals Thanks, Moshe > On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:08 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: > > > > On Aug 27, 2008, at 6:48 AM, Moshe Matitya wrote: > >

RE: Can't build using Ant with MSVC 6.0

2008-08-27 Thread Moshe Matitya
On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:08 PM, Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2008, at 6:48 AM, Moshe Matitya wrote: > > > I am trying to build log4cxx 0.10.0 using ant, but the build fails > > because of apr-util compilation errors. Am I doing something wrong > > h

Can't build using Ant with MSVC 6.0

2008-08-27 Thread Moshe Matitya
I am trying to build log4cxx 0.10.0 using ant, but the build fails because of apr-util compilation errors. Am I doing something wrong here? I am using the following environment: Micosoft Windows XP SP2 Microsoft Visual C/C++ 6.0 SP 6 Microsoft Platform SDK Feb. 2003 Apac

RE: Extending DailyRollingFileAppender

2008-07-29 Thread Moshe Matitya
ng policy. > > On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "Moshe Matitya" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am interested in extending DailyRollingFileAppender. The existing > > appender can be configured to roll over at intervals like once a > > month, > >

Extending DailyRollingFileAppender

2008-07-29 Thread Moshe Matitya
I am interested in extending DailyRollingFileAppender. The existing appender can be configured to roll over at intervals like once a month, once a week, once a day, once a half-day (AM/PM), once a minute, etc. What I need is to be able to roll over at other intervals in between, such as every ten

log4cxx sources on littletux

2008-01-07 Thread Moshe Matitya
Does anyone know why the log4cxx source tarball in is unchanged since 20 Sep., 2007? Thanks, Moshe Z. Matitya Kayote Networks, Ltd.

RE: Unable to run executable built with MSVC 8.0

2007-07-04 Thread Moshe Matitya
Isn't this something that should be done by ant when building log4cxx? Thanks, Moshe From: Roger Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 7/5/2007 12:01 AM To: 'Log4CXX User' Subject: RE: Unable to run executable built with MSVC 8.0 Mosh

Unable to run executable built with MSVC 8.0

2007-07-04 Thread Moshe Matitya
I built a app using log4cxx with MSVC 8.0, and when I try to run it, it fails at startup, producing the following error message: Unable To Locate Component This application has failed to start because MSVCP80D.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem. No

RE: Race condition with FileAppender.

2007-07-01 Thread Moshe Matitya
On Saturday, June 30, 2007 7:27 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: > > LOGCXX-129 only reported problems with AsyncAppender which > was badly flawed in log4j 1.2.13 and earlier and deadlock > reports in log4j started getting more frequent. The log4cxx > AsyncAppender was pretty much a straight port of the

RE: AsyncAppender not working

2007-06-27 Thread Moshe Matitya
> > > > > > > > > > > > value="%d %-5p [%t] %C{2} (%F:%L) > - %m%n"/> > > > > > > > >

RE: AsyncAppender not working

2007-06-26 Thread Moshe Matitya
Unless I'm missing something, it appears to be impossible to configure log4cxx to use AsyncAppender. Is there anybody out there who has actually used it? If so, can you show me how your config file looks? Thanks, Moshe > -Original Message- > From: Moshe Matitya [ma

AsyncAppender not working

2007-06-21 Thread Moshe Matitya
I have been unable to get the AsyncAppender to work. For every appender that is added to the AsyncAppender, the following error message appears: No appender named [] could be found. And not surprisingly, no logging happens. I whittled this down to a simple example using an AsyncAppender wit

RE: status of ODBC appender.

2007-01-21 Thread Moshe Matitya
Why does it only work on Windows? If it uses the ODBC API, it ought to be possible to build it on *nix systems using unixODBC, no? Moshe On 1/19/2007, Matthew Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Really isn't any code its just another appender, there are like 3 properties you need to set on

RE: log4cxx-0.9.8 release mode

2006-04-30 Thread Moshe Matitya
There are probably a lot of people (such as myself  :-) who would find it useful if the 0.9.8 distribution could include the ant-generated MSVC project files.  This would save us all the trouble of installing and configuring ant.   Thanks,   Moshe   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

RE: Logging before main() crashes in 0.9.7

2006-04-23 Thread Moshe Matitya
ll,however the crash your talking about is fairly simple, I found it before on the group, if you post what line its crashing on maybee I can give some insight.  I think some variable has to be forced to be loaded before anything else cause the load order gets borked on msvc compiles for so

How to build 0.9.8 on Windows?

2006-04-22 Thread Moshe Matitya
How does one build log4cxx 0.9.8 with MSVC on Windows?  I downloaded the source tarball [log4cxx-0.9.8.tar.gz] from http://littletux.homelinux.org/log4cxx/, but there is no MSVC project file in there -- in fact, the entire "msvc" subdirectory seems to be missing.  Yet, there is a zip file contai

Logging before main() crashes in 0.9.7

2006-04-22 Thread Moshe Matitya
I am using log4cxx 0.9.7 on Windows with MSVC 6.0 SP6.  I have found that attempting to log anything before main() is executed (e.g., in a function called from the initializer of a global static variable) will always result in a crash.  This is apparently happening because of some log4cxx stati

RE: Re: Expected release of 0.9.8 (mee too)

2006-04-02 Thread Moshe Matitya
I'd like to know as well. We're currently using 0.9.7 in our apps, because we'd rather use a stable release than a snapshot of a moving target that might turn out to have problems. But we're quite anxious to switch ovr to 0.9.8 as soon as its ready. Thanks, Moshe -Original Message- F