RE: Possible 1.2.8 release

2003-02-16 Thread Scott Schram
At 10:09 PM 2/16/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we look through the open bugs and see if there are any others that we should address for 1.2.8? -Mark Please consider applying my patch, which fixes one bug, and adds some minor improvements: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

RE: Possible 1.2.8 release

2003-02-16 Thread mwomack
I did a quick review of open bugs. Besides the fix for #12366, I think we should consider fixes for: 14827/16998 - JDBCAppender memory leak. 11570/16170 - Null Pointer Exception in XMLLayout. I'll help with applying fixes if agreed. -Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Indentation!!!

2003-02-16 Thread Jacob Kjome
One thing that isn't being enforced is the order of keyword modifiers.  The following change would enable that. change         public|protected|private|abstract|static|final|synchronized|transient|volatile|native|strictfp     to         true    

RE: Possible 1.2.8 release

2003-02-16 Thread mwomack
Should we look through the open bugs and see if there are any others that we should address for 1.2.8? -Mark > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 6:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12366] -

Log4net & interoperability

2003-02-16 Thread Nicko Cadell
We haven't been properly introduced. I am the porter and maintainer of log4net (http://sf.net/projects/log4net). I have been camping out on this list for about 18 months, basically to steal all your good ideas ;) Ceki is very keen for some closer cooperation between the various log4X ports, and he