> Oooh. Test cases. Primo!
We aim to please! :)
> Sounds like you have a good handle on it to me. I usually create the
> witness file by generating it using the test case.
Mmm, that would be easier, but I never trust myself that way. I'll copy a
shell from another witness, and modify it to
Paul,
> I've just started preparing for the change, and started off by thinking
> about the Test cases first.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that the following is the process to add a test
> case for log4j & MDC?:
>
> * modify XMLLayoutTestCase, add another test method for MDC.
> * create an xmlLayo
Ok, thanks to all the +1's.
I've just started preparing for the change, and started off by thinking
about the Test cases first.
Am I correct in thinking that the following is the process to add a test
case for log4j & MDC?:
* modify XMLLayoutTestCase, add another test method for MDC.
* create a
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 March 2003 21:32
> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Adding more MDC support to several classes
>
>
> Ok, thanks everyone for their input. I'm learning th
> After reading the thread over a couple of times, could I summarise the
> feeling of the group, that the format:
>
>
>
>
> ...
>
>
> would be acceptable to the group? (along with valid
> Transform.escapeTag
> stuff)
>
> The element cou
+1
At 08:31 AM 3/20/2003 +1100, you wrote:
Ok, thanks everyone for their input. I'm learning things about XML on the
way, so thanks.
After reading the thread over a couple of times, could I summarise the
feeling of the group, that the format:
...
Ok, thanks everyone for their input. I'm learning things about XML on the
way, so thanks.
After reading the thread over a couple of times, could I summarise the
feeling of the group, that the format:
...
would be acceptable to the group?
> >
> >You don't need to use a CDATA section for the message, you could use
> >Transform.escapeTags for the message itself. In fact the best idea
> >would be to use a version of Transform.escapeTags that tried
> to escape
> >tags, but if there were too many escapes (i.e. more than 4
> escapes
At 09:55 AM 3/19/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >> timestamp="213341234" level="INFO" thread="main">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
>
> I don't see why the
>
> and
>
> Need to be different.
>
> E
At 04:54 PM 3/19/2003 +, you wrote:
> At 03:21 PM 3/19/2003 +, you wrote:
> >Couple of questions.
> >
> >How will the logging event properties be represented in the
> event XML?
>
> Good question. How about the following,
>
>timestamp="213341234" level="INFO" thread="main">
>
> >> timestamp="213341234" level="INFO" thread="main">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
>
> I don't see why the
>
> and
>
> Need to be different.
>
> Essentially you just have a 'generic'
lob. The NDC is a stack of
data, the stack information is lost in the xml version. This could better be
encoded as:
[item value]
[item value]
[item value]
Or:
[item value]
[item value]
[item value]
Or:
Just more thoughts...
Thanks for listening
Nicko
>
> >
-
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 March 2003 14:45
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Adding more MDC support to several classes
>
>
>
> Paul,
>
> I suggest the following format:
>
> timestamp="213341234" level="I
003 14:45
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Adding more MDC support to several classes
>
>
>
> Paul,
>
> I suggest the following format:
>
> timestamp="213341234" level="INFO"
> thread="main">
>
>
>
Paul,
I suggest the following format:
...
Note that the MDC is optional. So the DTD should allow for the possibility
of no MDC.
At 10:14 PM 3/19/2003 +1100, you wrote:
Just following up on something Mark has mentioned offline re: adding some
more support for MDC thr
arch 2003 11:14
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Subject: Adding more MDC support to several classes
>
>
> Just following up on something Mark has mentioned offline re:
> adding some more support for MDC through XMLLayout, and
> Chainsaw. I wanted to run some things
Just following up on something Mark has mentioned offline re: adding some
more support for MDC through XMLLayout, and Chainsaw. I wanted to run some
things by the group. Sorry if this is a bit long.
The first thing that needs to happen is to modify the log4j.dtd file to
incorporate the MDC struct
17 matches
Mail list logo
