RE: Log4J compiling requirements

2003-02-15 Thread Luis Reis
1.4 to compile. -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:12 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Log4J compiling requirements > > >

RE: Log4J compiling requirements

2003-02-15 Thread Mark Womack
m: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:12 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Log4J compiling requirements > > > > Luis, > > Compilation tricks are a headache to maintain. Unless there > is a compelling > rea

Re: Log4J compiling requirements

2003-02-15 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Luis, Compilation tricks are a headache to maintain. Unless there is a compelling reason, the code should compile with JDK 1.2 not only 1.4. At 21:27 15.02.2003 +, you wrote: Hi, I know that the running requirement for Log4J 1.2 is JDK 1.1, although some parts of it only compile on JDK 1.2

Log4J compiling requirements

2003-02-15 Thread Luis Reis
Hi, I know that the running requirement for Log4J 1.2 is JDK 1.1, although some parts of it only compile on JDK 1.2 (eg, LF5). Is it acceptable that minimum JDK for compilation is 1.4 although the code can still run on 1.1 or 1.2 ? Thanks, Luis --