DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22894] - Single backslash not accepted in File param value

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22894] - Single backslash not accepted in File param value

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22894] - Single backslash not accepted in File param value

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22894] - Single backslash not accepted in File param value

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22894] - Single backslash not accepted in File param value

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33502] - DOMConfigurator

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33502] - DOMConfigurator

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33502] New: - DOMConfigurator

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 04:54 PM 2/10/2005, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Is there any way we could get the Jakarta PMC and/or the ASF Board to kill the Commons-Logging project once and for all? Escalating this issue to the Board would require a huge amount of effort, cause much aggravation and generate a lot of bad blood. I

RE: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, >Is there any way we could get the Jakarta PMC and/or the ASF Board to kill >the Commons-Logging project once and for all? I doubt it. There are strong supporters for JCL within and outside the ASF. As usual, the critics tend to be louder than the supporters, but people are voting by taking

Re: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 20:20, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hello, > > For those interested I've been busy writing an article about the problems > encountered when using JCL. > >http://www.qos.ch/logging/classloader.jsp Is there any way we could get the Jakarta PMC and/or the ASF Board to kill th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33493] - contribution to log4j: servlet diagnostic context

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33493] New: - contribution to log4j: servlet diagnostic context

2005-02-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

UGLI compile-time binding

2005-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Instead of using a bundled config file in order to find the logging implementation to bind to, each version of ugli-xxx.jar is bound at compile time. I had to move UGLI source files to a new folder called src/filtered-java. Since log4j will not compile without UGLI, filtered versions UGLI files

cvs commit: logging-log4j/docs faq.html ugli.html

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 05:06:36 Modified:src/xdocs ugli.xml faq.xml docs faq.html ugli.html Log: doc updates Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +28 -23logging-log4j/src/xdocs/ugli.xml Index: ugli.xml ==

cvs commit: logging-log4j ugli.xml build.xml

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 04:23:39 Modified:.ugli.xml build.xml Log: Updates for static binding in UGLI Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +80 -71logging-log4j/ugli.xml Index: ugli.xml === RCS file:

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/ugli .cvsignore

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 04:19:19 Added: src/java/org/apache/ugli/impl .cvsignore src/java/org/apache/ugli .cvsignore Log: Originals for UGLI files can be found at LOG4J_HOME/src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli/. Files in LOG4J_HOME/src/org/apache/ugli/ are copies (except

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/ugli LoggerFactory.java ULogger.java LoggerFactoryAdapter.java

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 04:17:32 Removed: src/java/org/apache/ugli/impl JDK14LoggerFA.java JDK14Logger.java SimpleLoggerFA.java NOPLoggerFA.java MessageFormatter.java SimpleLogger.java NOPLogger.java src/ja

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli/impl NOPLoggerFA.java JDK14Logger.java SimpleLoggerFA.java NOPLogger.java MessageFormatter.java JDK14LoggerFA.java SimpleLogger.java

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 04:09:48 Modified:src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli LoggerFactory.java Added: src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli ULogger.java LoggerFactoryAdapter.java src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli/impl NOPLoggerFA.java

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli/impl - New directory

2005-02-10 Thread ceki
ceki2005/02/10 04:09:43 logging-log4j/src/filtered-java/org/apache/ugli/impl - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 10 February 2005 18:27, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > UGLI is rather modest in its goals. It does not have the pretension of > initiating any major technological leap. JCL promises more than what it can > deliver. UGLI does what JCL does today but without the headaches. This is a *very* good as

Re: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 09:17 AM 2/10/2005, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 10 February 2005 03:34, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > nless the ugli-xxx.jar file is corrupt, UGLI cannot never cause bugs of > Type-I, Type-II or Type-III for the simple reason that all the required > files are bundled together in the ugli-xxx jar fil

Re: Taxonomy of JCL problems

2005-02-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 10 February 2005 03:34, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > nless the ugli-xxx.jar file is corrupt, UGLI cannot never cause bugs of > Type-I, Type-II or Type-III for the simple reason that all the required > files are bundled together in the ugli-xxx jar file. UGLI's LoggerFactory > only uses the class