Re: [GUMP@brutus]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

2005-02-27 Thread Curt Arnold
On Feb 27, 2005, at 9:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To whom it may engage... Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following

[GUMP@brutus]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

2005-02-27 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: log4j source trees

2005-02-27 Thread Curt Arnold
On Feb 27, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, I'm fine with that, +0. I'm also fine with waiting until our SVN move to do this type of reorganization, because SVN has additional facilities for splitting subtrees under a project that are kind of nice for this. Yoav It would also make it e

RE: log4j source trees

2005-02-27 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, I'm fine with that, +0. I'm also fine with waiting until our SVN move to do this type of reorganization, because SVN has additional facilities for splitting subtrees under a project that are kind of nice for this. Yoav > -Original Message- > From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

log4j source trees

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Smith
Given we have the core, optional etc jars output, what does everyone think about breaking the single source tree into multiple source trees aligned with these outputs. Something like: src/java/core src/java/optional src/java/oro etc etc. It could simplify the build process, as the compile/jar et

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-chainsaw (in module logging-chainsaw) failed

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Smith
Curt, I notice that you've done me a favour and added the other log4j jars to the gump build, and now the gump output looks like it's success, although I have not seen the success email from gump as yet. Many thanks. cheers, Paul Smith Curt Arnold wrote: On Feb 26, 2005, at 1:21 AM, Scott Debo

RE: Design and evolution of log4j (Was: AppenderSkeleton.isActive, etc)

2005-02-27 Thread Mark Masterson
Hi Ceki, Yes, the tone of my mail was harsh. I find it unfortunate that this was the case, but I also believe it was necessary. I also believe I can explain why, if you're willing to listen. As I've already mentioned, I believe the current discussion is a manifestation of social issues -- the t

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

2005-02-27 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue