Sorry, I meant an example of how the JSON looks with these cases. I am less
concerned with the XML.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Here is an example for the current XML: http://pastebin.com/cLbuwe4b
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ralph Goers w
Here is JSON in all camelCase: http://pastebin.com/8zpHsjNL
and in CamelCase for Elements and camelCase for attributes:
http://pastebin.com/ed0R0grE
You can edit org.apache.logging.log4j.core.jackson.JSONConstants to play
with the names (and expect some test to fail).
You can comment out a // SO
Here is an example for the current XML: http://pastebin.com/cLbuwe4b
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Can you post an example?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 6:51 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This messages is about the format of tag names, not the shap
Perhaps we can change the color and use a higher resolution.
Von: Luigi Alice [mailto:luigi.al...@persis.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:49
An: Log4J Developers List
Betreff: AW: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
Pick this one… ☺
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616371/log4J2_Orange_
Can you post an example?
Sent from my iPad
> On May 13, 2014, at 6:51 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This messages is about the format of tag names, not the shape of the elements.
>
> Right now, I have XML elements names in CamelCase format and XML attributes
> in camelCase format. Pretty standa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996793#comment-13996793
]
Joern Huxhorn commented on LOG4J2-623:
--
@Gary Ah, ok. The earlier [comment from
Mika
Yang Hua Jie created LOG4J2-635:
---
Summary: Log4j 2 should also support properties file
Key: LOG4J2-635
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-635
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Wish
This messages is about the format of tag names, not the shape of the
elements.
Right now, I have XML elements names in CamelCase format and XML attributes
in camelCase format. Pretty standard.
For JSON, I have both types of names as camelCase, but it makes the code a
little awkward to undertamd a
The jira ticket outlines a process IIRC.
Gary
Original message From: Ralph Goers
Date:05/13/2014 17:36 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to vote.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996585#comment-13996585
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-623:
The above should say "if you really want grandpar
That was a brain fart on my part.
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> So in this case equalsIgnoreCase can just be isEmpty().
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: 13 May 2014 10:31
> Subject: svn commit: r1594247 -
> /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/lo
I don’t recall that we had “rules”. Just that we were going to vote.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> STV: ABEF
> (I do not like D at all FWIW)
> We can only vote on the "lettered" logos?
>
> We did not have STV in our orginal rules IIRC.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May
And we can calculate the winner using http://paul-lockett.co.uk/stv.html or
http://www.openstv.org/
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
> elaborate Apache set-up to work.
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 13:42, R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996853#comment-13996853
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-623:
-
@Joern Huxhorn : Yeah, previous Log4j 1 and 2 i
STV: ABEF
(I do not like D at all FWIW)
We can only vote on the "lettered" logos?
We did not have STV in our orginal rules IIRC.
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter (
> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominatio
Then we could do it manually. You can find some documentation on STV at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
> elaborate Apache set-up to work.
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996256#comment-13996256
]
Joern Huxhorn commented on LOG4J2-623:
--
If you are interested: [this|http://pastebin.
So in this case equalsIgnoreCase can just be isEmpty().
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 13 May 2014 10:31
Subject: svn commit: r1594247 -
/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/rolling/SizeBasedTriggeringPolicy.java
To: comm
I tried to set up Steve, but it's pretty undocumented and requires an
elaborate Apache set-up to work.
On 13 May 2014 13:42, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I was hoping we could use Steve and vote as we do for board members (STV).
> That way one vote would find the winner. They way we are doing it I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996593#comment-13996593
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-623:
Gary,
You seem to want to name all your elements
I was hoping we could use Steve and vote as we do for board members (STV).
That way one vote would find the winner. They way we are doing it I don’t
think any one logo is going to get immediate consensus so we would need
multiple votes to get a majority for the winner.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996214#comment-13996214
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-623:
---
About JSON schema for the contextMap, can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory resolved LOG4J2-634.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-rc2
> ThrowableProxy ctor throws an exception when us
And so... what? Do we vote on this ML or edit the wiki?
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Round 2!
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Gregory resolved LOG4J2-583.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-rc2
Resolving as the functionality is in. There will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996655#comment-13996655
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-623:
-
I like this latest marker representation. It's
Hi All:
Here is a heads up of some soon to be committed ThrowableProxy changes.
The RC1 version of the class is good at providing extra information for
stack traces.
The rework I am doing will make the class work better for its second
purpose, describing a Throwable received from XML, JSON or a
I we are using STV then my vote is
DABIEFHGC
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Are we voting here or on the wiki. If here my vote is for “D”.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>> I've given them a letter
>> (h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996568#comment-13996568
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-623:
-
@Mikael Ståldal : Your example does not cut it,
That's right, round 2.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Round 2!
>
>
> On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>
>>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>>> I'v
OK, I'll do all that today.
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Collapse is OK w me. Should we Javadoc all the helpers as private?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Matt Si
Are we voting here or on the wiki. If here my vote is for “D”.
Ralph
On May 13, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter
> (https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
> saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
> Hope this he
Can you make it a neat vector graphic?
On 13 May 2014 08:13, Luigi Alice wrote:
> Perhaps we can change the color and use a higher resolution.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Luigi Alice [mailto:luigi.al...@persis.de]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:49
> *An:* Log4J Developers List
> *Betreff:* AW:
Round 2!
On 13 May 2014 08:24, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> Nobody is voting... :-|
>> I've given them a letter (
>> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vot
Pick this one… ☺
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616371/log4J2_Orange_Gr%C3%BCn.png
Von: Remko Popma [mailto:remko.po...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Mai 2014 14:47
An: Log4J Developers List
Betreff: Re: Log4J-2.0 New Logo
Nobody is voting... :-|
I've given them a lette
Yes.
Sent from my iPad
> On May 13, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Collapse is OK w me. Should we Javadoc all the helpers as private?
>
> Gary
>
>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> That lang package was me. It's fine to collapse them; I was just thinking
Collapse is OK w me. Should we Javadoc all the helpers as private?
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> That lang package was me. It's fine to collapse them; I was just thinking
> of doing some categorization with the helpers package. I called it lang
> because that's whe
I thought we already did round 1 of voting?
Gary
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Nobody is voting... :-|
> I've given them a letter (
> https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
> saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
> Hope this helps.
>
> But if no
That lang package was me. It's fine to collapse them; I was just thinking
of doing some categorization with the helpers package. I called it lang
because that's where ClassLoader is. :)
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I prefer to move all classes into the helpers directory and get
Nobody is voting... :-|
I've given them a letter (
https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations ), so we can vote by
saying A: +1 or B: +1, etc.
Hope this helps.
But if nobody votes then perhaps Ralph should just pick one... :-P
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996210#comment-13996210
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-623:
---
marker now looks like this:
{code}
"marke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996192#comment-13996192
]
Joern Huxhorn commented on LOG4J2-623:
--
I'd suggest to use something like
{code:xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996195#comment-13996195
]
Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-623:
---
Why are you going to undo the improvement t
43 matches
Mail list logo
