Re: Bug list survey

2007-08-23 Thread Curt Arnold
On Aug 23, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: Looks good - A few things: 1. helpers/Constants.java is in both extras & component. I looked in helpers for other dups, but didn't see any - not sure if we have other dups.. Without Constants in extras, TimestampEqualsRule and Timest

Re: Bug list survey

2007-08-22 Thread Curt Arnold
st Subject: RE: Bug list survey Looks good - A few things: 1. helpers/Constants.java is in both extras & component. I looked in helpers for other dups, but didn't see any - not sure if we have other dups.. 2. When I try to use UDPReceiver (with XMLDecoder), it looks like it's

RE: Bug list survey

2007-08-22 Thread Scott Deboy
PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Original Message- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 8/22/2007 10:19 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: RE: Bug list survey Looks good - A few things: 1. helpers/Constants.java is in both extras & component. I looked in help

RE: Bug list survey

2007-08-22 Thread Scott Deboy
Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 8/22/2007 8:48 PM To: Log4J Developers List Subject: Bug list survey I don't know what possessed me, but I think I've reviewed all the open log4j bugs today and fixed several of them. I didn't see any of the other ones that seemed re

Re: Bug list survey

2007-08-22 Thread Paul Smith
I don't know what possessed me, but I think I've reviewed all the open log4j bugs today and fixed several of them. I didn't see any of the other ones that seemed ready for log4j 1.2.15. The big clusters of bugs seemed to be: Unless someone wants to lobby for a particular bug, I think I'

Bug list survey

2007-08-22 Thread Curt Arnold
I don't know what possessed me, but I think I've reviewed all the open log4j bugs today and fixed several of them. I didn't see any of the other ones that seemed ready for log4j 1.2.15. The big clusters of bugs seemed to be: 1) Tomcat shutdown/restart breaking what were intended to be

RE: Bug List

2004-08-02 Thread Michael Price
--- Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you really talking about completely trivial patches? Blindly > applying patches can lead to unmaintainable code which no body > understands. (I'd of course like to avoid that...) > > If you are talking about totally trivial patches, then a list of su

RE: Bug List

2004-08-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
quot; now would be useful. Thanks, Paul Smith > -Original Message- > From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 6:22 AM > To: Log4J Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug List > > Hi Michael, > > I think this would definitel

RE: Bug List

2004-08-01 Thread Paul Smith
ve list on what should be "applyable" now would be useful. Thanks, Paul Smith > -Original Message- > From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 6:22 AM > To: Log4J Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug List >

Re: Bug List

2004-07-30 Thread Jacob Kjome
Hi Michael, I think this would definitely be valuable. Please do it so we can cut down on the number of outstanding bug reports. thanks, Jake Quoting Michael Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've noticed that several of the "Minor" bugs in the bug database for > log4j have patches included inline

Bug List

2004-07-30 Thread Michael Price
I've noticed that several of the "Minor" bugs in the bug database for log4j have patches included inline or as attachments. Some of them are over a year old and the patches don't look like they have been applied yet. I've weeded out a few duplicate bug reports and included a few patches myself. Wo