:-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/10/08, at 13:00, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Of course I'm getting side tracked, it's what I do!
>
>> On 7 October 2014 22:47, Remko Popma wrote:
>> +1 I would also like to release what we have now.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 2014/10/08, at 11:43, Gary
Of course I'm getting side tracked, it's what I do!
On 7 October 2014 22:47, Remko Popma wrote:
> +1 I would also like to release what we have now.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2014/10/08, at 11:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Are we getting side tracked here? Is this all required for 2.1. We got
+1 I would also like to release what we have now.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/10/08, at 11:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Are we getting side tracked here? Is this all required for 2.1. We got up to
> RC3 this weekend. It seems we should go to RC4 and then continue on 2.2-SNAP.
>
> Gary
>
>>
Are we getting side tracked here? Is this all required for 2.1. We got up
to RC3 this weekend. It seems we should go to RC4 and then continue on
2.2-SNAP.
Gary
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> So far I've figured out that you can specify multiple classes in a
> ServiceLoade
So far I've figured out that you can specify multiple classes in a
ServiceLoader file. Each line can have a class. And the order things are
parsed are determined by ClassLoader.getResources() (which I'd assume is
classpath order). This could really use a sort of extension that allowed
prioritizing
It's actually a bit more complicated than I thought. Sometimes, the
properties are there for overriding the default (usually with another
log4j-provided class instead of a custom one). I'll have to delve into this
a bit more.
On 7 October 2014 21:18, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Let me compile a list of
Let me compile a list of example service classes that could benefit from
using ServiceLoader. I'll be back soon.
On 7 October 2014 21:11, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Yes, I looked at it and purposely decided not to use it for the
> LoggerContextFactory. I wanted to do API version checking to make sure
Yes, I looked at it and purposely decided not to use it for the
LoggerContextFactory. I wanted to do API version checking to make sure what we
were binding with is compatible.
As for using it for other stuff, I am not really sure how or why ServiceLoader
was bypassed.
Ralph
On Oct 7, 2014,
This was added back in 1.6, and I still don't see it used very often. It
seems like a more effective method of making customizable service classes
than all system properties all the time (even though you can technically
just make a log4j2.component.properties file to set them). I think we could
use
