ilto:Nicholas.Orr@;mim.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:02 PM
To: 'Log4J Users List'
Subject: RE: org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender - Help with
setLocationIn fo
You sure 1.4 is *dependent* on the "-g" command.
I just did a test then, and used "javac test.java&q
labs.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 3:40 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender - Help with setLocationIn
fo
Hello Folks,
I ran a few tests with Log4J 1.2.6. Used JDK 1.3.1_04 & 1.4. In both cases,
the location info is *dependent* on the "-g"
Subject: RE: org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender - Help with
setLocationIn fo
log4j location info behavior does NOT depend on the JDK, at least not on
1.3 or 1.4.
At 11:47 08.11.2002 +1000, you wrote:
>Figured this one out,
>
>I'm using Jdev9i 9.0.3
>It lets you choose which versi
y, November 11, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: 'Log4J Users List'
> Subject: RE: org.apache.log4j.net.SocketAppender - Help with
> setLocationIn fo
>
>
> Well there must be difference between the way 1.4 & 1.3
> compile classes by
> default.
> Ie 1.4 automatically a
nder - Help with setLocationIn
fo
log4j location info behavior does NOT depend on the JDK, at least not on
1.3 or 1.4.
At 11:47 08.11.2002 +1000, you wrote:
>Figured this one out,
>
>I'm using Jdev9i 9.0.3
>It lets you choose which version of java to use, in the projects wh
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> log4j location info behavior does NOT depend on the JDK, at least
> not on 1.3 or 1.4.
That is true, but not very helpful. Gautam gave me the answer a few days ago:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Log4J/message/2970
Or at least what I
log4j location info behavior does NOT depend on the JDK, at least not on
1.3 or 1.4.
At 11:47 08.11.2002 +1000, you wrote:
Figured this one out,
I'm using Jdev9i 9.0.3
It lets you choose which version of java to use, in the projects where
location is not working they are using 1.3
In the projec
