nt: April 11, 2002 1:06 PM
> To: 'Log4J Users List'
> Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
>
>
> I find this curious since 1.2 is supposed to be backward
> compatible with
> 1.1.3. Does the wrapper use some deprecated methods or
> something? I'm sure
>
st'; Edward Q. Bridges
> Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
>
>
> The commons-logging will support log4j 1.1.3 and not log4j 1.2. If you
> download the api, they have a wrapper which act as the
> factory framework.
> For log4j 1.2 a new wrapper need to be written.
&g
April 11, 2002 12:10 PM
> To: Edward Q. Bridges; Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
>
>
> BTW, I couldn't find that information in the Commons documentation.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
BTW, I couldn't find that information in the Commons documentation.
-Original Message-
From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen
Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
i'm not familiar enoug
e Sports, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:41 PM
> To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen
> Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
>
>
> i would strong
]
-Original Message-
From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen
Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
i would strongly suggest that you switch your application to using the logging
interface in
the jakarta commons
apira
>-Original Message-
>From: Edward Q. Bridges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:41 PM
>To: Log4J Users List; Steve Cohen
>Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
>
>i would strongly suggest that you switch your application to using the
>
i would strongly suggest that you switch your application to using the logging
interface in
the jakarta commons package. then, you are free to plug in either log4j or jdk1.4.
the
great flaw of both of these packages is that they were not coded from an interface,
and
the interface they offe
et there someday, but log4j is already here.
Anyway, like I said, I am biased, but biased because I have found log4j to
be so incredibly useful.
hope it helps your decision,
-Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10
pril 10, 2002 6:14 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
> I am in the position of recommending a switch to either log4j or
> jdk 1.4 from a roll-your-own system that has outgrown its
> original usefulness.
I would go for log4j... but thn you are asking in the wro
> I am in the position of recommending a switch to either log4j or
> jdk 1.4 from a roll-your-own system that has outgrown its
> original usefulness.
I would go for log4j... but thn you are asking in the wrong place IMHO. This
is a log4j user list... I am guessing this makes most of us biased tow
ised to find my original message published.
Oh well.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
I am in the position of recommending a switch to either log4j or jdk 1.4 from a
roll-your-own system th
I am in the position of recommending a switch to either log4j or jdk 1.4 from a
roll-your-own system that has outgrown its original usefulness.
Can anyone make recommendations to me either way about which way I should go? Unlike
some of the remarks I've read in the archives, I have no existing
Google is your friend:
http://www.google.com/search?q=log4j+vs+1.4
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
Cheers,
Scott
Steve Cohen wrote:
> I am in the position of recommending the adoption of either something like log4j or
>the
I am in the position of recommending the adoption of either something like log4j or
the jdk 1.4 logging classes to replace a home-grown logging system that has seen
better days.
Can someone point me at an article comparing log4j to jdk1.4 java.util.logging? Or
failing that, give me their op
15 matches
Mail list logo
