Re: Problem with Log4j (Configuration)

2004-12-21 Thread Jacob Kjome
At 12:35 AM 12/22/2004 -0500, you wrote: > >thanks Jake, its working...:) > >but whats the detailed solution if i required two different configuration >files. > You'll have to come up with a repository selector that doesn't currently exist (that I know of) which supports differenti

Re: Problem with Log4j (Configuration)

2004-12-21 Thread Ran//-\\mir
thanks Jake, its working...:) but whats the detailed solution if i required two different configuration files. --- On Sat 12/18, Jacob Kjome < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Jacob Kjome [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org Date: Sat, 18 De

Re: Problem with Log4j (Configuration)

2004-12-21 Thread Ran//-\\mir
For some reasons it is required ro use different configuration files... so whats the second solution of the problem? --- On Sat 12/18, Jacob Kjome < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Jacob Kjome [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:31

Re: Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 10:57 PM 12/21/2004, you wrote: Kevin A. Burton wrote: It doesn't appear theres a way to set the Subject of an email based on a ConversionPattern. Am I wrong? I hope so! Ah... looks like this is a feature in 1.3alpha... Can't wait! :). That and the %throwable conversion patte

The date and time not showing up in the log file

2004-12-21 Thread manoj JC
I have three log files set up in my log4j.properties. The last one is not displaying the dates of the log entries. Three log files are created and the messages are getting logged to the corresponding log files. But the date and time is not showing up. This is the log4j.proprties file that I am u

Re: Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:57 PM 12/21/2004, you wrote: Kevin A. Burton wrote: It doesn't appear theres a way to set the Subject of an email based on a ConversionPattern. Am I wrong? I hope so! Ah... looks like this is a feature in 1.3alpha... Can't wait! :). That and the %throwable conversion pattern will be killer!

Re: Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Ceki Gülcü wrote: It's a very recently introduced feature in 1.3, you have to get it from CVS. (It's not even in alpha-3.) Yeah... I was just poking through and found that... pretty cool. Kevin -- Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator). Visit http://rojo.com. Ask me for an invite! Also see irc.freenode

Re: Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Kevin A. Burton wrote: It doesn't appear theres a way to set the Subject of an email based on a ConversionPattern. Am I wrong? I hope so! Ah... looks like this is a feature in 1.3alpha... Can't wait! :). That and the %throwable conversion pattern will be killer! Kevin -- Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggrega

Re: Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:35 PM 12/21/2004, you wrote: It doesn't appear theres a way to set the Subject of an email based on a ConversionPattern. Am I wrong? I hope so! It's a very recently introduced feature in 1.3, you have to get it from CVS. (It's not even in alpha-3.) Kevin -- Ceki Gülcü The complete log4

Custom subject with SMTPAppender?

2004-12-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
It doesn't appear theres a way to set the Subject of an email based on a ConversionPattern. Am I wrong? I hope so! Kevin -- Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator). Visit http://rojo.com. Ask me for an invite! Also see irc.freenode.net #rojo if you want to chat. Rojo is Hiring! - http://www.rojonetw

Re: SMTPAppender using dedicate threads?

2004-12-21 Thread Curt Arnold
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. Burton wrote: Kevin A. Burton wrote: Transport.send() usually blocks. It seems to make sense to add a param to SMTPAppender to simply accept messages for delivery and them hand them off to a dedicated thread so that hte caller can return from log.info()... T

Re: SMTPAppender using dedicate threads?

2004-12-21 Thread Kevin A. Burton
Kevin A. Burton wrote: Transport.send() usually blocks. It seems to make sense to add a param to SMTPAppender to simply accept messages for delivery and them hand them off to a dedicated thread so that hte caller can return from log.info()... Thoughts? FYI... I was thinking on the way home that