RE: How to disable log4j option using GUI?

2005-04-05 Thread Jacob Kjome
You might want to look into some of the Log4j config web interfaces out there. Whether you configured Log4j initially via properties or not, Log4j exposes its API to you. So, you can programmatically modify settings. See the third party utilities listed on Log4j download page... http://loggin

RE: How to disable log4j option using GUI?

2005-04-05 Thread utpal
Basically, I am using more than one appender. SMTP appender is only for critical messages. So in JSP or HTML (GUI) I am providing option that whether user is required these critical messages by mail or not. So if he selected mail option then he will receive mail otherwise not. But I am using log4j.

Re: log4j trace enabled version

2005-04-05 Thread Jacob Kjome
Very proactive. Nicely done! Jake Quoting Peter DeGregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here is a link to a version of log4j called trace4j which provides a > built-in trace level to log4j > http://home.comcast.net/~pdegregorio/index.html . A detailed how-to will be > provided shortly for anyone incl

Re: log4j trace enabled version

2005-04-05 Thread Peter DeGregorio
Here is a link to a version of log4j called trace4j which provides a built-in trace level to log4j http://home.comcast.net/~pdegregorio/index.html . A detailed how-to will be provided shortly for anyone inclined to do this themselves and has about an hour to work on it. -- Peter - Original

Re: JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread James Stauffer
I started on a version that used prepared statements (you can have the code if you wish) but I ran into issues trying to keep it generic because Oracle doesn't have generated keys. On Apr 5, 2005 11:47 AM, Lenin David Lozano Argel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess that the choice is to use anot

RE: JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread Lenin David Lozano Argel
I guess that the choice is to use another JDBCAppender implementation. The JDBCAppender that comes with log4j does not use PreparedStatement, and this is a poor practice with JDBC. Lenin David Lozano Argel Analista Arquitectura InformÃtica Gerencia de Desarrollo Suramericana S.A. Email: [EMAIL P

Re: JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread James Stauffer
I don't know when it will be released. Probably "when it is ready". :-) On Apr 5, 2005 11:26 AM, John Ferron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And when is 1.3 going to be a stable production release? > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/5/2005 11:22:11 AM >>> > 1.3 has a replacement (DBAppender). > > On Apr

Re: JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread John Ferron
And when is 1.3 going to be a stable production release? >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/5/2005 11:22:11 AM >>> 1.3 has a replacement (DBAppender). On Apr 5, 2005 11:09 AM, John Ferron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious as to when the JDBCAppender class is slated to be replaced > in the current imp

Re: JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread James Stauffer
1.3 has a replacement (DBAppender). On Apr 5, 2005 11:09 AM, John Ferron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious as to when the JDBCAppender class is slated to be replaced > in the current implemenation of Log4j. I saw that there is an > implemention by http://www.dankomannhaupt.de/projects/.

JDBCAppender replacement

2005-04-05 Thread John Ferron
I'm curious as to when the JDBCAppender class is slated to be replaced in the current implemenation of Log4j. I saw that there is an implemention by http://www.dankomannhaupt.de/projects/. I was just curious as to what I should be using. I would like to be using the log4j implemention but I saw

RE: How to disable log4j option using GUI?

2005-04-05 Thread Bradley, Todd
Maybe I don't understand your question, but wouldn't it just be something like this? mySMTPAppender.close(); Todd. > -Original Message- > From: utpal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 6:25 AM > To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org > Subject: How to disable log4j o

RE: simple question from newcomer

2005-04-05 Thread Bradley, Todd
I've never used it personally, but there is a JDBCAppender class for sending log messages to a database. Here is the reference page: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/jdbc/JDBCAppen der.html Todd. > -Original Message- > From: William Cai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Can log levels be configured based on NDC?

2005-04-05 Thread James Stauffer
Just set the componentA logger to info and the componentB logger to debug. XML example config: On Apr 5, 2005 6:31 AM, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have an application composed of some low level libraries and some > higher level components all c

Re: Generate Protocols with Log4J

2005-04-05 Thread James Stauffer
It will be easy to setup a distince appender per username if the number of usernames is low. I don't think you can deallocate a logger and I don't know if the memory usage will be significant so you may want to do some testing if no one else answers this. Another option: Set the username in MDC

How to disable log4j option using GUI?

2005-04-05 Thread utpal
Hi All, I am displaying the mailing(smtp) option for log4j in GUI. I have set the smtp appender in log4j.properties file. While run time(i.e. using GUI) how I can disable the smtp appender? What is the way to do this...?

Can log levels be configured based on NDC?

2005-04-05 Thread Rob Oxspring
We have an application composed of some low level libraries and some higher level components all combined to create a single tool. As we wrote ComponentA it was useful to have the lower level libraries logging lots of debug but now we have confidence in ComponentA we can switch the libraries t

simple question from newcomer

2005-04-05 Thread William Cai
Hi all, Don't want to waste your time. My question is how to configure log4j, let it log to my database. Do I need to do any custom development? If yes, could you please give my some tips? Thank you! -William

AW: Generate Protocols with Log4J

2005-04-05 Thread Weseloh, Markus
That might be a solution. But is it possible to configure "dynamic" categories so that for each "username" I'll get a separate logfile (like "username".log)? Another question: when I implement this approach I get a Logger for each user (and for each class that needs a Logger). When many users acces