Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

t;>>> project, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apache UIMA). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Marshall Schor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/17/2017

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

>> -Marshall Schor > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 7/17/2017 10:20 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Gitter is public. And Slack is a paid service (free version has a > > lot > > > >>>&

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

> > >>>> On 7/17/2017 10:20 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Gitter is public. And Slack is a paid service (free version has a > lot > > >>>>> > > >>>> of > > >>> > > >>

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

without someone > >>>>> > >>>> funding > >>> > >>>> it. Gitter, however, is free for all GitHub projects (and Gitlab too I > >>>>> think?) and is even open source now that Gitlab owns them. > >>>>> >

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

not very feasible for public chats without someone >>>>> >>>> funding >>> >>>> it. Gitter, however, is free for all GitHub projects (and Gitlab too I >>>>> think?) and is even open source now that Gitlab owns them. >>>>> >&

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

y, 07:08 Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? To: Log4J Users List So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure to document any and all decisions on the ML, it could be OK. Gary On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > https://gitter.im/apache/home We can

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

gt; Hey actually, a slack channel would fit right in. Any specific > reason to > > > > choose gitter over slack ? @matt > > > > > > > > thanks & regards, > > > > Chandra > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Gary Grego

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

gitter over slack ? @matt > > > > > > thanks & regards, > > > Chandra > > > > > > > > > From: Gary Gregory > > > Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 > > > Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? > > > To: Log4J Users List >

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

would fit right in. Any specific reason to > >> choose gitter over slack ? @matt > >> > >> thanks & regards, > >> Chandra > >> > >> > >> From: Gary Gregory > >> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 > >> Subject: Re: Desire

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

t;> >> From: Gary Gregory >> Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 >> Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? >> To: Log4J Users List >> >> So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure to >> document any and all decisions on the ML, it could b

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

ry > Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 > Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? > To: Log4J Users List > > So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure to > document any and all decisions on the ML, it could be OK. Gary On Mon, Jul > 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sic

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

Hey actually, a slack channel would fit right in. Any specific reason to choose gitter over slack ? @matt thanks & regards, Chandra From: Gary Gregory Sent: Tuesday, 18 July, 07:08 Subject: Re: Desire for a Gitter channel? To: Log4J Users List So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

So, like a private Slack? Bah, why not, as long as we make sure to document any and all decisions on the ML, it could be OK. Gary On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > https://gitter.im/apache/home > > We can request a log4j Gitter channel for realtime chat.

Re: Desire for a Gitter channel?

+1 for gitter! thanks, Chandra On 18 Jul 2017, 12:05 AM +0530, Matt Sicker , wrote: > https://gitter.im/apache/home > > We can request a log4j Gitter channel for realtime chat. This could be > handy for quick questions and other things that waiting on Stack Overflow > or

Desire for a Gitter channel?

https://gitter.im/apache/home We can request a log4j Gitter channel for realtime chat. This could be handy for quick questions and other things that waiting on Stack Overflow or mailing list posts isn't as appropriate for. This would be very different from the ASF Slack as it is open to