Hello!
Using the socket appender with log4j1 and logstash simply worked. I can't
get it to work with log4j2.
Any advice on this? Can I make socket appender behave like 1.x?
cheers
Hello,
If you want the functionality of version 1 in version 2, can you create a patch
for a new layout and attach it with tests to a new jira?
Gary
Original message From: Karl Kildén
Date:05/16/2014 16:32 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Logstash & Lo
/16/2014 16:32 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Logstash & Log4J2
> Hello!
>
> Using the socket appender with log4j1 and logstash simply worked. I can't
> get it to work with log4j2.
>
> Any advice on this? Can I make socket appender behave like 1.x?
>
> cheers
>
Karl Kildén
Date:05/19/2014 02:52 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Logstash & Log4J2
Hi Gary,
Perhaps but if it is not possible it is also the wrong route... It would be
better to get proper log4j2 support done for logstash. I see some
engagement in the area when I google
gmail.com> Date:05/19/2014 02:52 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Logstash & Log4J2
> Hi Gary,
>
> Perhaps but if it is not possible it is also the wrong route... It would be
> better to get proper log4j2 support done for logstash. I see some
> engagement
all
> understand
> > each other please?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > ---- Original message From: Karl Kildén <
> > karl.kil...@gmail.com> Date:05/19/2014 02:52 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: Re: Logstash & Log4J2
> &
not going to work with 2.0 out of the box since our implement is
> > different. Can you provide more information to make sure we all
> understand
> > each other please?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message ----From: Karl Kildén <
> > karl.
> each other please?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > Original message ----From: Karl Kildén <
> > karl.kil...@gmail.com> Date:05/19/2014 02:52 (GMT-05:00)
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: Re: Logstash & Log4J2
> > Hi Gary,
> >
>
So logstash expects serialized Java Log4j 1.2 event objects over a
> > socket?
> > > That's not going to work with 2.0 out of the box since our implement is
> > > different. Can you provide more information to make sure we all
> > understand
> > > each other ple
