On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Geoff Peart wrote:
Is there a high level changes/inclusion list available for 1.2.15?
Thanks
Geoffrey
A change report is part of the release candidate and is also
available at http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/changes-
report.html#1.2.15. The final change
Is there a high level changes/inclusion list available for 1.2.15?
Thanks
Geoffrey
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:12 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Steve Souza
ok, I see in this class structure the receiver, but not the
SocketReceiver.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/companions/component/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/
Will this mailing list be notified when log4j 1.2.15 is released?
On 6/5/07, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Jun 4, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Steve Souza wrote:
<>
Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be
updated on
the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not
everyone is
on this mailing list.
A total reworking of the online content is in-progress. All the
Thanks for you help by the way :)
On 6/4/07, Steve Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<>
Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be updated on
the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not everyone
is on this mailing list.
<>
Where is the sandbox code kep
<>
Not sure who controls the website, but that direction should be updated on
the site as currently it indicates log4j 1.3 is the future. Not everyone is
on this mailing list.
<>
Where is the sandbox code kept? Also, will the release you are referring
too be available in this link:
http://archi
On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Steve Souza wrote:
I am interested in using a Log4j 1.3 SocketReceiver for JAMon to
receive
LoggingEvents. I have a couple questions
1) Per the following link I see the first release of log4j 1.3 was
in 2004,
and it still hasn't had a beta let alone been releas
From: Slaughter, Stan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/4/2007 7:20 AM
To: Log4J Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Logging - What good is it ?
Looks Nice. I'll be out of pocket this week - but I'll be giving it a
run when I get back.
I have never understand the sparcit
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@FDC
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:44 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Logging - What good is it ?
You could have your IT folks rsync the log file regularly to a location
that you have access to , and then use whatever tools you want for
slicing & dicing the log file
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/4/2007 7:20 AM
To: Log4J Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Logging - What good is it ?
Looks Nice. I'll be out of pocket this week - but I'll be giving it a
run when I get back.
I have never understand the sparcity of web enabled tools for
strating though. :)
Application Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Steve Souza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 3:44 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
I just released JAMon 2.6 today, and as mentioned in this thread it has
uld like to get a link to log4jdbc up there...
>
> Arthur Blake
>
> - Original Message
> From: Jacob Kjome < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Log4J Users List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:07:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
>
&
y to add
something to the Wiki...
I would like to get a link to log4jdbc up there...
Arthur Blake
- Original Message
From: Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Log4J Users List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:07:45 PM
Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
Pl
Blake
- Original Message
From: Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Log4J Users List ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:07:45 PM
Subject: Re: Logging - What good is it ?
Please add a link to JAMon in the Log4j Wiki. It sounds very useful!
http://wiki.apache.org/lo
ur machines. Still some elbow grease required, I
imagine.
-Original Message-
From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:54 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Logging - What good is it ?
wow! Your setup sounds worse than mine!
I didn't think t
a socket appender available that will allow you to send
back to one of your machines. Still some elbow grease required, I
imagine.
-Original Message-
From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:54 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Logging - What good is
t: RE: Logging - What good is it ?
wow! Your setup sounds worse than mine!
I didn't think that was possible!
Can those guys share out that ONE directory for you to see?
I feel your pain, whereever you are.
-Original Message-
From: Slaughter, Stan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu
wow! Your setup sounds worse than mine!
I didn't think that was possible!
Can those guys share out that ONE directory for you to see?
I feel your pain, whereever you are.
-Original Message-
From: Slaughter, Stan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:39 AM
To: log4
18 matches
Mail list logo
