x.html
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan J [mailto:maps.this.addr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:29 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> Hi Walter,
>
> Can you point me to where one can try these freeware web service appe
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-log4j/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Evan J [mailto:maps.this.addr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:29 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
Hi Walter,
Can you point me to
CPU
pressure by using parallel processing in the stream, perhaps tux.
-Original Message-
From: Evan J [mailto:maps.this.addr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:54 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
This is just gone off the tangent line... in a good way
y, May 01, 2014 10:59 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> This thread originally started to ask about logging to a web service (that
> term usually implies SOAP). It seems to have gone off into another
> direction and I'm not sure if there is st
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:59 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
This thread originally started to ask about logging to a web service (that term
usually implies SOAP). It seems to have
not sure what it is.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph
> >>>
> >>> On May 1, 2014, at 8:51 AM,
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> >>>> I take it we were discussing the possib
;> Ralph
>>>
>>> On May 1, 2014, at 8:51 AM,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>>>> I take it we were discussing the possibilities for high speed
>> production
>>> logging. Previous people have rig
logging. Previous people have rightly pointed out that a simplistic
> > approach using soap might be ineffecient
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
> > >
h speed production
> logging. Previous people have rightly pointed out that a simplistic
> approach using soap might be ineffecient
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
&
ineffecient
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more.
&
database storage
>>> might be used.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:16 PM
>>> To: Log4J Users List
>>> Subject: Re: Web Service Appende
...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more.
Ralph
On May 1, 2014, at 8:22 AM, walter_mar...@dellteam.com wrote:
> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> As I say ther
oers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:16 PM
>> To: Log4J Users List
>> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>>
>> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely slow if every
>> log event is a single request. Can y
s also not involved,
when a process aborts.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:18 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
I guarantee you, on a busy system with lots of logging sending a SOAP message
for e
4j should make whatever architecture is chosen
> cleaner.
>
> Thanks
>
> Walter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appe
]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It is very,
very good at collecting log events and forwarding them. However, you could use
a JMS appender to write your events to the MQ
: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:16 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely slow if every
> log event is a single request. Can you elaborate on what you really want to
> do?
>
> Ralph
>
What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It is very,
very good at collecting log events and forwarding them. However, you could use
a JMS appender to write your events to the MQ queue.
Ralph
On May 1, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Evan J wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> All the request a
ks
Walter
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 9:28 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
So the app logs to JMS, not SOAP. Later you have something else that consumes
the queue and calls the WS, but that wo
messages from the
Processing stream. Some sort of queuing and thread, or database storage might
be used.
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:16 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
A web service
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
Try this url
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-log4j/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Evan J [mailto:maps.this.addr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 7:21 PM
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Web Service Appender
I sea
So the app logs to JMS, not SOAP. Later you have something else that
consumes the queue and calls the WS, but that would not be done by Log4j.
Or are you suggesting that Log4j should be able to consume from a Q and
call a WS?
Gary
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Evan J wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
>
Hi Ralph,
All the request and response messages, some header data, with additional
information, are placed in an MDC, packaged in an Appender and sent to an
MQ queue which, ultimately, makes a call to the service. It's a centralized
logging model for all the applications in a cluster. Frankly, I d
A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely slow if every
log event is a single request. Can you elaborate on what you really want to
do?
Ralph
On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Evan J wrote:
> Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an obvious, and
> this has
Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an obvious, and
this has already been implemented by at least someone.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
> Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web service.
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J
>
Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web service.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J wrote:
> I searched around, but I could not find an off-the-shelf Appender that
> sends logs to a web service. Is there any?
>
On Feb 5, 2008 6:46 AM, Duseja, Sushil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While running the main class, it seems as if the append() method is being
> called multiple times
I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding you, but it is perfectly normal
for the append method to be called multiple times; it will be c
27 matches
Mail list logo
