I'm trying to get information on the StatusLogger. I've searched and so far
the log4j docs say:
"Records events that occur in the logging system."
There are also a bunch of articles related to people having problems with the
StatusLogger. I'm just looking to find ou
Yes, the StatusLogger is how Log4j logs things that happen within Log4j itself.
If you are writing plugins for Log4j those should also use the StatusLogger as
they effectively become part of Log4j. If the are regular application code then
they should not use the StatusLogger.
Although the
The code happens to be a log4j2 appender, so it sounds like you're saying we
should be using the StatusLogger, correct? The issue is that we want to
capture the events from our appenders to a central location.
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme
Maybe we should rename "StatusLogger" to something more "internal" sounding
like "CoreLogger" or "InternalLogger"?
Gary
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Yes, the StatusLogger is how Log4j logs things that happen within Log4j
>
What do you mean by “capture the events from our appenders”? The StatusLogger
is primarily used during configuration or to log errors that occur in the
appender. If you are trying to capture the events being logged that sounds a
bit odd as that is the purpose of an appender.
If you want to
ues to a central location. Of course if the http appender has
trouble communicating with the http endpoint there's not much we can report on
that, though I guess we could write to the StatusLogger at that point.
I hope I explained it well enough so that you understand what it is we're
s logging appender (via the
> configuration) in hopes to get these issues to a central location. Of course
> if the http appender has trouble communicating with the http endpoint there's
> not much we can report on that, though I guess we could write to the
> StatusLogger at that
That's what we're doing. The appender it writing to a logger and via the
configuration we have that going to this http endpoint. We're careful to
ensure that the events raised by our appender don't come back to itself.
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: Status
that the events raised by our appender don't come back to itself.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:04:57 -0700
>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>
>> You can
nicating with
> the http endpoint there's not much we can report on that, though I guess we
> could write to the StatusLogger at that point.
>
> I hope I explained it well enough so that you understand what it is we're
> trying to do.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> >
rray to be the original
object that was logged?
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:08:38 -0700
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> OK - so it sounds like you are fine.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> >
array to be the
> original object that was logged?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:08:38 -0700
>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>
>> OK - so it sounds like
I'm not necessarily after the string. I'm trying to get the original object
that was passed to one of the logging methods. It could have been a string or
some complex object.
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov
gt; that was passed to one of the logging methods. It could have been a string
> or some complex object.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:30:37 -0700
>> To: log4j-user@logging.ap
object
>> that was passed to one of the logging methods. It could have been a string
>> or some complex object.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>>
>>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:30
above or:
logger.Error("this is my error message");
within the appender I want to "failover" this event to the appender's logger.
Is that possible?
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:01:23 -070
e object. I'm trying to see how I can "resubmit" this event to the
> appender's logger in a consistent fashion regardless of how it was originally
> logged. So whether I do the above or:
>
> logger.Error("this is my error message");
>
> within the
Hi,
In log4j2, is there an equivalent of log4j 1.x'
LogLog<https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/helpers/LogLog.html>for
internal logging purposes?
StatusLogger is contained in org.apache.logging.log4j.status.StatusLogger?
Is StatusLogger import contained i
StatusLogger is the correct one when writing plugins for Log4j2. If you’re
upgrading a custom plugin from version 1, you need to change which classes
it references.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:47 EDMONDO SENA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In log4j2, is there an equivalent of log4j 1.x'
StatusLogger is part of log4j-api-2.13.0.jar.
Ralph
> On Feb 20, 2020, at 6:47 AM, EDMONDO SENA wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In log4j2, is there an equivalent of log4j 1.x'
> LogLog<https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/helpers/LogLog.html>
lt;https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/java-api/current/_using_another_logger.html>
for using a different logger other than log4j2.
org.apache.logging.log4j
log4j-to-slf4j
2.11.1
But now on starting the application, I am seeing some warnings like below
DEBUG S
Hello,
How do I configure log4j2 to send StatusLogger output to a Syslog appender?
Our application runs on several instances and logs to a remote instance for
centralised logging, however status logging only appears in the logs on
each instance.
Thank you,
/David
han log4j2.
>
>
>org.apache.logging.log4j
>log4j-to-slf4j
>2.11.1
>
>
> But now on starting the application, I am seeing some warnings like below
>
> DEBUG StatusLogger org.slf4j.helpers.Log4jLoggerFactory is not on
> classpath. Good!
> DEBUG Stat
ption occurred processing Appender
WINGMAN java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
This shows an earlier line get overwritten when the
ConcurrentModificationException occurs. I need to figure out what is causing
this and why StatusLogger does not append to the end of the file. Our log4j2
config
You need to configure log4j: Please see
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/configuration.html
Gary
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 AM, David KOCH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How do I configure log4j2 to send StatusLogger output to a Syslog appender?
>
> Our application runs on se
Gary,
This is the StatusLogger. Messages are via StatusListeners. The only one we
provide is the StatusConsoleListener. If a user wants to do something else
they need to implement their own StatusListener and register it.
Ralph
> On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
Ralph,
I fine point I missed, thank you.
Would it be too weird to provide a bridge StatusListener that forwards to
an Appender or to all of Log4j?
Gary
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> Gary,
>
> This is the StatusLogger. Messages are via StatusListeners. The
Hello,
Thank you for your answers. I gather this is not possible purely by
configuring log4j2?
I could implement a ConfigurationListener which logs changed configurations
to a regular logger but how would that re-act if the new configuration
contains some invalid XML? The StatusLogger supplies
StatusLogger was not meant for that kind of flexibility as it is for
diagnostics of the logging system.
While in theory it would be possible to create a StatusListener that binds to
an Appender I don’t believe it would be simple. Plus, it couldn’t use Plugins
to be configured. Frankly, it
gt; to a regular logger but how would that re-act if the new configuration
> contains some invalid XML? The StatusLogger supplies some feedback in that
> cases.
>
> Regards,
>
> /David
>
> On 27 July 2015 at 19:13, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Ralph,
>>
&g
2.StatusLogger.level=DEBUG
Still nothing, so I dug a little bit in the code and found that the
StatusLogger logs its messages either to the listeners (if there's at
least one) or to a SimpleLogger (logger) which is initialized in the
constructor (method StatusLogger#logMessage()).
I f
-cp "launcher.jar;
lib\*" .
I got a "ERROR StatusLogger Unable to locate a logging implementation,
using SimpleLogger"
Please give me some advice and where to look for the answer.
Thanks!
BR//Wei
messages until log4j2 is successfully configured and
started.
For example if there's a problem with log4j2 configuration file (wrong syntax
or file doesn't exist) log4j2 uses StatusLogger to print an error to System.err:
ERROR StatusLogger Unable to access file:/C:/log_config.xml%2
g".
>
> I thought that the mechanism was similar in log4j 2.x and apparently it
> should be by setting
> log4j2.StatusLogger.level=DEBUG
>
> Still nothing, so I dug a little bit in the code and found that the
> StatusLogger logs its messages either to the listeners (if
couldn't manage to get them.
> In log4j 1.x you would set the system property "log4j.debug".
>
> I thought that the mechanism was similar in log4j 2.x and apparently it
> should be by setting
> log4j2.StatusLogger.level=DEBUG
>
> Still nothing, so I dug a lit
"log4j.debug".
I thought that the mechanism was similar in log4j 2.x and apparently it should
be by setting
log4j2.StatusLogger.level=DEBUG
Still nothing, so I dug a little bit in the code and found that the
StatusLogger logs its messages either to the listeners (if there's at least
ying to get log4j 2.0 debug information printed out in the console
>>> but I couldn't manage to get them.
>>> In log4j 1.x you would set the system property "log4j.debug".
>>>
>>> I thought that the mechanism was similar in log4j 2.x and appa
nformation printed out in the console
>>>> but I couldn't manage to get them.
>>>> In log4j 1.x you would set the system property "log4j.debug".
>>>>
>>>> I thought that the mechanism was similar in log4j 2.x and apparently
I'm trying to get log4j 2.0 debug information printed out in the console
>>>>> but I couldn't manage to get them.
>>>>> In log4j 1.x you would set the system property "log4j.debug".
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought that the mechanism was simila
Nope. The ConsoleListener is only added when there is a status attribute on a
configuration element. StatusLogger doesn’t ever register a ConsoleListener
itself. StatusConfiguration in core does that.
Ralph
On Aug 3, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> I haven't looked at the co
Oh. But if listeners.size() <= 0 statuslogger calls logger.logMessage() where
logger is a SimpleLogger (to the console). You're saying that doesn't work?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/08/03, at 16:58, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Nope. The ConsoleListener is only added
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Discussion-about-correct-initialization-of-log4j2-in-OSGi-context-td39733.html
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/ERROR-StatusLogger-Unable-to-locate-a-logging-implementation-using-SimpleLogger-tp39952p39955.html
terminal, I get
ERROR StatusLogger Reconfiguration failed: No configuration found for
'55f96302' at 'null' in 'null'
In both cases, I invoke the command with
-Dlog4j.configuration=/path/to/my/log4j.properties
And the log4j.properties is in the old log4j style (i.e
un it through a terminal, I get
>
> ERROR StatusLogger Reconfiguration failed: No configuration found for
> '55f96302' at 'null' in 'null'
>
>
> In both cases, I invoke the command with
>
> -Dlog4j.configuration=/path/to/my/log4j.properties
>
context of an
>> uber-jar created with the maven shade plugin and am experiencing issues.
>>
>> I wrote a simple HelloWorld class that illustrates the issue.
>>
>> When I run this class through intelliJ, everything works fine. But when I
>> run it through a t
Le jeu. 7 juill. 2022, 2 h 54 a.m., Ralph Goers
a écrit :
> When you run as an uber jar you are most likely breaking things.
>
> Log4j uses a file named Log4j2Plugins.dat to define its plugins. Every jar
> that has Log4j plugins will have one. When you create an uber jar most
> likely only one is
Hi Alain,
On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 11:35, Alain Désilets wrote:
> If you look at my pom, you can see that there is a filter in the
> configuration of the shade plugin that remove the Log4j2Plugins.dat files.
> This seems to work because
>
> jar -tf iutools-core-1.0.2-jar-with-dependencies.jar | grep
reason why I added this filter is that I was
getting a
log4j2 ERROR StatusLogger Unrecognized conversion specifier
Reading about this, I found several posts that said the solution was to
filter the Log4j2Plugins.dat files.
So I should merge the files instead?
Question: Would I get the same iss
e.logging.log4j.core` package. The plugins from
>> `log4j-1.2-api` are not in this package. Instead of deleting these
>> files you should merge them using the Maven shade plugin proposed by
>> Ralph.
>>
>
> Thx Piotr,
>
> This is interesting. The reason
49 matches
Mail list logo
