More observations:
oldkey.zip
LICENSE and NOTICE are present, but with Unix style linefeeds.
both bin/2.0/release/log4net.dll and bin/3.5/release/log4net.dll describe
themselves as Apache log4net for the .NET Framework 2.0. Everybody else has the
expected application description.
log4net-sdk-
Hi all,
the vote has passed with five +1s by PMC members (Scott, Ivan,
Christian, Ron, myself) and two further +1s by community members
(Javier, Dominik) and I'll proceed with the process.
The release artifacts are already in the dist area and are waiting for
the mirrors to pick them up. Once I
Observations:
GPG keys check out
comparing the source zip with the SVN tag, the following items are not in the
source zip:
doap_log4net.rdf (DOAP file placed here for convenience)
src/site/fml (empty directory)
src/site/resources/js (empty directory)
tests/lib/prerequisites.txt (note on prerequ
+1
From: Stefan Bodewig
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Cc: gene...@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache log4net 1.2.11 based on RC1
It's been a long time since the last log4net release and we've
accumulat
On 2011-10-10, Ivan Habunek wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> I'm not a .net user so I didn't check the actual code performance.
> I'll believe you when you say it's much better. :)
Thanks, Ivan. Only time will tell about "better", at least it will
allow log4net to be used in more modern scenarios.
I'll
On 2011-10-10, Curt Arnold wrote:
> Has anyone compared how the new log4net.dll performs with the previous
> release's test suite?
I just did. You have to tweak log4net 1.2.10's build file in the tests
directory to make it work with .NET 2.0 and explicitly run it with nant
-t:net-2.0 as 1.2.10 d
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, 1900 GMT 9-Oct 2011
>
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
I checked everything I said, but did not manage to get the .NET beast
running fully. I will
