[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790118#comment-13790118 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - IMHO your FAQ should provide more detailed information on the

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790265#comment-13790265 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - @dominik - I get the impression from your comments that you

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790315#comment-13790315 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - @Dominik, no offence taken. My opinion, as you'll have

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13790367#comment-13790367 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-397:

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789012#comment-13789012 ] Dominik Psenner commented on LOG4NET-397: - Since you have to share assemblies, it

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789039#comment-13789039 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - ... it may be time to learn about the GAC 1. I know about

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789058#comment-13789058 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-397: Joe, you are right. When we considered

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789062#comment-13789062 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-397: type forwarding wouldn't work for 1.x -

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789065#comment-13789065 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - ... if a third party library uses log4net and another third

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789073#comment-13789073 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - Using a privatePath attribute on a probing element in your

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789079#comment-13789079 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LOG4NET-397: So far I had assumed you had no

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4NET-397) Conflicts due to new strong name key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13789105#comment-13789105 ] Joe commented on LOG4NET-397: - So far I had assumed you had no influence on the suppliers