On 2011-08-20, Roy Chastain wrote:
>> I should add that NAnt.exe.config contains
>>
>> and seems to need it. This may complicate things even further.
> See this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd409253.aspx
Yes, I knew that, I should have elaborated more.
> My gut says that thi
>I should add that NAnt.exe.config contains
>
>and seems to need it. This may complicate things even further.
See this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd409253.aspx
My gut says that this setting is a BAD thing.
1) - It is a RUNTIME not COMPILE time setting. If code for legacy
se
On 2011-08-19, Roy Chastain wrote:
> I have done some research this morning, and have found a couple of
> articles suggesting "fixes", but I do not yet understand the
> ramifications. This is all to do with a new code security model created
> in 4.0 and it is going to take time to understand.
>
On 2011-08-19, Roy Chastain wrote:
> While, this is certainly a problem, it SHOULD not be the issue already
> reported, because those reports were against log4Net running on the 2.0
> CLR instead of the 4.0 CLR.
OK.
> I have done some research this morning, and have found a couple of
> articles
an Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 23:41
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: ADO.NET Appender and FX 4.0
Hi,
Roy said in some thread people had reported problems with the ADO.NET
appender when running on .NET 4.0.
I managed to get to the point where NAn
Hi,
Roy said in some thread people had reported problems with the ADO.NET
appender when running on .NET 4.0.
I managed to get to the point where NAnt at least tries to run the unit
tests on 4.0 and this is what I see:
Unhandled Exception: System.TypeLoadException: Inheritance security rules
vio
