Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> You're on the right track in thinking the UTF-8 is the only quasi-sane way
> to mix Latin and CJK type characters.
It seems that we've solved the problem now using UTF-8 encoding.
I don't know whether it's "sane" but it seems to work for
Japanese and a few languages us
> I don't know what's right, unless perhaps just using something like
> UTF-8 is suitable. I don't know enough to know how to correctly label
> something that uses (say) 8859-1 for most content but also includes
> &#...; escapes for characters not from 8859-1 - maybe there is a
> correct way to la
> Vid, please have a look at this document. As you can see, Japanese
> characters are possible within iso-8859-1.
This is actually incorrect. Perhaps the truth is more like "certain
viewing software is willing to display Japanese characters when
suitably encoded even in text marked as being in 8
