In a message dated 27.02.2009 14:22:20 Eastern Standard Time,
jjllamb...@gmail.com writes:
> "mu'o" is in selma'o COI, it introduces a vocative phrase, so it is
> naturally followed by the name or description of the person one is
> talking to, or by mi'e plus the name or description of the speak
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:55 AM, wrote:
> Why is "mu'o" not said last? The whole community does this. It seems to me
> that as soon as "mu'o" is used, the speaker should be waiting for a
> response, rather than continuing to speak, which negates the whole point of
> "mu'o".
Well "mu'o" has mo
On 2/27/09, morphemeadd...@wmconnect.com wrote:
>
> Why is "mu'o" not said last? The whole community does this. It seems to me
> that as soon as "mu'o" is used, the speaker should be waiting for a
> response,
> rather than continuing to speak, which negates the whole point of "mu'o".
"mu'o" is
In a message dated 27.02.2009 4:41:52 Eastern Standard Time,
selck...@gmail.com writes:
>
> mu'o doi cilre be fi zo go'i za'a .e zo cei .a'o mi'e selkik
> (over, O learner about "go'i", i see, and hopefully "cei", i'm selkik)
>
Why is "mu'o" not said last? The whole community does this. It
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:47 PM, J Y wrote:
> { go'i } repeats the last bridi. Does it only refer to the whole bridi
> ? Or can it refer to the selbri ? Or to the selbri tanru ?
It repeats the selbri of the last bridi. But not just the selbri,
yes, it takes its context in the bridi as well, fo
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 12:47:37 J Y wrote:
> { go'i } repeats the last bridi. Does it only refer to the whole bridi
> ? Or can it refer to the selbri ? Or to the selbri tanru ?
>
> e.g. You said " mi clira klama le zarci fu le karce "
> and I want to say that you do come early, but not by car
