NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-11 Thread Struan Donald
* at 11/04 08:28 +0100 Mark Fowler said: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: > > I'll also be able to give a quick status update on the website for NMS > (probably at the same time as I'll be using it as my example) what is the status of the NMS thing. i'm liable to have some s

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-11 Thread Mark Fowler
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: > > I'll also be able to give a quick status update on the website for NMS > > (probably at the same time as I'll be using it as my example) > > what is the status of the NMS thing. i'm liable to have some spare time > over the weekend so if there's an

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-11 Thread jo walsh
> 4) Install Apache::Template, Bundle-XML, Template Toolkit 2.02 on penderel > I think this has already been mostly done, but I could be wrong. after much grappling with CPAN shell trying to upgrade us to 5.6.1, this is all done now, though a couple of newer versions of XML modules - not th

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-17 Thread Philip Newton
Mark Fowler wrote: > 3) Write a set of scripts ...with a bunch of different extensions such as .pl .plx .cgi for combinations of "operating system" + web server that map scripts to interpreters by extension and/or directory rather than by shebang line... >that are al

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-17 Thread Struan Donald
* at 17/04 14:00 +0200 Philip Newton said: > Mark Fowler wrote: > > 3) Write a set of scripts > > ...with a bunch of different extensions such as .pl .plx .cgi for > combinations of "operating system" + web server that map scripts to > interpreters by extension and/or directory rather than by sh

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-17 Thread Mark Fowler
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: > * at 17/04 14:00 +0200 Philip Newton said: > > Mark Fowler wrote: > > > 3) Write a set of scripts that are all basically the same but have > > > different #!/usr/bin/perl lines on the top and tell you the > > with a bunch of different extensions suc

Re: NWS (was Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April)

2001-04-17 Thread Struan Donald
* at 17/04 14:09 +0100 Mark Fowler said: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: > > surely there should be a better way than this? after all the > > combinations involved are quite numerous. is the notion of something > > that does : > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > if [ -e /usr/bin/perl ]; then >