Re: Tea (was Re: Bolloxia)

2002-03-04 Thread Piers Cawley
Chris Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:04:13AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Chris Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Mmm... True Names. Have you seen the new edition of that (True Names >> and the Opening of the Cyberspace Frontier) with a bunch of essays >>

Re: *****SPAM***** Fw: http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/

2002-03-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassa

Re: DNS Server Admin Review (Sybex)

2002-03-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Dean wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:02:59AM +, Paul Mison wrote: > > >Linux DNS Server Administration > > >Craig Hunt > > > Just out of interest, does the book cover the djb DNS applications, or > > just BIND? > > YAH! Someone responded to one of my reviews! Its not o

Re: DNS Server Admin Review (Sybex)

2002-03-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Dean wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:02:59AM +, Paul Mison wrote: > > > >Linux DNS Server Administration > > > >Craig Hunt > > > > > Just out of interest, does the book cover the djb DNS applications, or > > > just BIND?

Re: Tea (was Re: Bolloxia)

2002-03-04 Thread Chris Benson
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:58:49AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: > Chris Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Interesting that the only other (intentional) fiction in the True Names > > book is from rms. > > Oh yes. The unintentional fiction that's resulted from the dot.com > crash is faintly a

Re: *****SPAM***** Fw: http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/

2002-03-04 Thread Chris Benson
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:26:20AM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- > > SPAM: End of SpamAssassin results - > > > > Wahay, spamas

wot no Inline::Parrot

2002-03-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
I've just started seriously looking at Inline (as it looks like a good way to prototype things that ultimately will be in C), and, yes, it does seem to live up to the hype. I could embed C, Java, Python, PERL [:-)] in my perl and it should work. (Admittedly I've not tried most of them yet) Howeve

Re: *****SPAM***** Fw: http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/

2002-03-04 Thread Rob Partington
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Wahay, spamassassin proved to be more reliable than human inspection > > shocker!!! > Of couse the only people who'll see this are those foolish enough to put > the Mail::Spamassassin check after filtering out mailing lis

module naming

2002-03-04 Thread Richard Clamp
Say if I were to figure out what versions modules were shipped with each release of perl were[0], so that I could write some code to figure out what were CPAN dependencies for a given module, where would I put it? I'm currently looking at $Module::Core::List{'5.6.1'}; but it doesn't seem quite ri

Security hole in Apache + PHP

2002-03-04 Thread Ivor Williams
see http://www.apacheweek.com/issues/02-03-01 May be useful info if any of you are running any PHP. Or may be useful ammunition in the arguments in favour of Perl. Ivor Williams Sopra Mentor Consultant LIFF? Core Systems Development Extn: 2436 Mobile: 07752 234832 -

[ANNOUNCE] Social meeting, Thursday

2002-03-04 Thread Paul Mison
There is a social meeting as usual on the day after the first Wednesday of the month (that's the seventh, in case you were wondering) at the Cittie of Yorke, downstairs in the cellar bar: http://london.pm.org/meetings/locations/cittieofyorke.html Peopke have brought the old idea of there being a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Social meeting, Thursday

2002-03-04 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:21:55PM +, Paul Mison wrote: > Also just a little reminder that I'd like any suggestions for talks for > the tech meeting too, please. Which would be when? -- Lord Protector David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david o/~ I want my SMTP o/~

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Social meeting, Thursday

2002-03-04 Thread Natalie Ford
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:21:55PM +, Paul Mison wrote: > Peopke have brought the old idea of there being a beer kitty back to the > fore, so we should probably do this; bring a fiver or tenner to chuck in > when the meeting starts. I hope this is optional. Once I have paid for my train fare