Re: Is This For Real?

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:46:26AM +, Dave Cross wrote: > For those playing the offline mail game it's this: --- Article #6478 Subject: london Author: yoyo Posted: 3/7/2002 08:21:21 PM what does London.pm do and where can I download it? ---

RE: Is This For Real?

Perhaps we should get a few tee-shirts printed with use london; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Clamp Sent: 08 March 2002 08:58 To: Dave Cross; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is This For Real? On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:46:26AM

Re: Is This For Real?

not sure but 'someone' couldn't help but attempt an answer.. On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Dave Cross wrote: > > > -- > > Drugs are just bad m'kay > >

Re: Is This For Real?

I would have asked the same question, not so long ago. not that I'm 'someone' mind you... fiq On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Richard Clamp wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:46:26AM +, Dave Cross wrote: > > > > For those playing the offline mail ga

Re: Voting scripts...

On 07 Mar 2002 07:42:37 -0800, (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote: > No, that's what it's been bastardized to mean. Originally, GET was for > idempotent operations, and POST was for things that change the state of > the server. Hence, GETs can be cached, but POSTs never are. > > Of course, like everything

Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

Thanks to everyone who turned up last night. I think it went quite well; we seemed to have about 50 people turn up through the evening, and the kitty was well enough stocked to have a surplus at the end. Hopefully you all enjoyed yourselves. (I even heard people talking about Perl. Scary, eh?) Al

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Paul Mison wrote: > haven't reviewed them. If you're on the list, *please* either review > the book or bring it along to a meeting so someone else gets the > chance. (Oh, and if somehow this list turns out to be wrong, feel free > to yell.) > > XSLT

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:42:27PM +, Paul Mison wrote: >If you're on the list, *please* either review >the book or bring it along to a meeting so someone else gets the >chance. (Oh, and if somehow this list turns out to be wrong, feel free >to yell.) >Network Troubleshooting Tools

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

On 08/03/2002 at 14:54 +, Graham Seaman wrote: >On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Paul Mison wrote: >I ended up with Dave's copy of XSLT. I will do a review (promise) - just >hoping to see a few more examples of what's expected first... ;-) You can see previous reviews at http://london.pm.org/reviews/ if

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:42:27PM +, Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Exim - Jo Walsh Actually this was just handed over to the State 51 posse as thanks for all the work they'd put in on Penderel and in the hope that it might be useful to them. It

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

my xslt review is shite. i hopwe to do a better one on the slashcode book. graham at codix has the xslt book and should do a much better review ...

Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post about the content but about the purpose of the episode. It's destroyed quite a lot of respect I had for the series... Anyone got any opinions? Red

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post > about the content but about the purpose of the episode. > It's destroyed quite a lot of respect I had for the series... > Anyone got any opinions? I liked it, bu

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

Pulled from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s mail (Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:33PM +): > My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post > about the content but about the purpose of the episode. > > It's destroyed quite a lot of respect I had for the series... > > Anyone got any

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post > about the content but about the purpose of the episode. > It's destroyed quite a lot of respect I had for the series... > Anyone got any opinions? Here'

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post > about the content but about the purpose of the episode. > > It's destroyed quite a lot of respect I had for the series... > > Anyo

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

Spoiler space added. On 08/03/2002 at 16:49 +, Rob Partington wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a >>post >> about the content

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

on 8/3/02 5:08 pm, Dave Cross at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [a spoiler] Heh, I thought that and all I saw was the trailer! -- matt Howard Cope (the simian) smells of George Orwell and lycra.

Testing my tests

So I've written a module, complete with docs and tests. What's the best way (if there is a way) to figure out if I've tested everything I should test ? How should I structure my tests for maintainability if I'm repeating tests with different values ? Why can't my code Just Work [tm] so I don't

Re: Is This For Real?

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:35:30AM -, iwilliams wrote: > Perhaps we should get a few tee-shirts printed with > use london; use London; shurely - I don't think we've ever been particularly pragmatic. Alex -- "Well, I say 'happy', but it's more a sort of vicious glee." - Alasdair Watson,

Re: Testing my tests

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:19:26PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote: > > So I've written a module, complete with docs and tests. > > What's the best way (if there is a way) to figure out if I've tested > everything I should test ? A good tool to look at is Devel::Cover. Assuming you're using MakeMake

Re: Testing my tests

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Simon Wilcox wrote: > So I've written a module, complete with docs and tests. Yey! > What's the best way (if there is a way) to figure out if I've tested > everything I should test ? If you write tests first then you don't have this problem. Why would you have written an

Re: Testing my tests

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:14:07PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:19:26PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote: > > > > So I've written a module, complete with docs and tests. > > > > What's the best way (if there is a way) to figure out if I've tested > > everything I should test

Re: Testing my tests

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:26:13PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 07:14:07PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:19:26PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote: > > > Why can't my code Just Work [tm] so I don't have to write all these > > > fecking tests ? [1] > >

Re: Ugly company sigs (was Re: Load testing)

On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:47:18PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: > However, you also suffer from what German Usenetters call "Kammquoting" > ("comb quoting") -- that is, alternate long and short lines due to bad FWIW -- It's referred to in RFC2646 as "embarrassing line wrap" http://www.zvon.org/tm

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Paul Mison wrote: > Roger Burton West who is lovely, cuddly Now I know you have taken leave of your senses :) /J\

Re: Stuff after the meeting (books, talks and stuff)

Paul Mison wrote: > > Server Load Balancing- Sue Spence I'm on the case, having liberated it from my spouse yesterday. I had hoped he would review it but he's evading responsibility by running off to California for 2 weeks tomorrow. Mea maxima culpa...

Re: Buffy - Sky 1, last night...

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:08:52PM +, Dave Cross wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > My post won't be spoilered but replies may be. This isn't so much a post > > about the content but about the purpose of the episode. > > > >