Re: irc #london.pm, or #london; #perl, ?

2002-06-28 Thread Natalie S. Ford
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:10AM -0400, Yeoh Yiu wrote: > *** london.pm No such channel You need the #. /join #london.pm (not /join london.pm) HTH ;-) -- Natalie S. Ford ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.natalie.ourshack.org/ http://natalief.livejo

Re: irc #london.pm, or #london; #perl, ?

2002-06-28 Thread Mark Fowler
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Natalie S. Ford wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:10AM -0400, Yeoh Yiu wrote: > > *** london.pm No such channel > > You need the #. > > /join #london.pm And the same server can be used for the more popular #perl, #bots, #modperl, #openframe, #axkit, #axkit-dahut, etc

Re: tonights pub

2002-06-28 Thread Simon Wistow
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:59:37PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson said: > > Tonight's pub was good IMHO. Lots of penguins. Sorry I couldn't make it. We (workmates and I) ended up going to the Goff[0] pub on Wells street (Ben Crouch's Tavern) and, err, didn't leave till much later. Simon [0] Technicall

RE: Tech meet, finalised.

2002-06-28 Thread Pierre Denis
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Ball > Sent: 27 June 2002 20:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tech meet, finalised. > > > Hi, all. > > We appear to have a tech meet on our hands. The good people at Fotango > have offered

Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread Alex McLintock
> > Now I know most same people will be using protocol 2 but there may be > > occasions when there is only a windows client around and you have no > choice. > > To get round this you have to use 3des which obviously brings it's own > > problems. the hatter: > > You mean there are still people u

Re: Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread Simon Wistow
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:34:46AM +0100, Alex McLintock said: > Is the consensus to use putty if you have to use ssh from Windows? YOU VILL CONFORM! ... I'll just get my gestapo-esque mac.

LiveJournal Blog

2002-06-28 Thread Alex McLintock
After installing Slashcode on two sites I'm deciding that it is inadequate for a Blog... Slashcode is fine for doing a site like Slashdot.org but for anything else it is not so hot. Anyway I am trying to install the LiveJournal.com code which is the most popular weblog among my friends. The pl

Re: The FileCache module

2002-06-28 Thread Mark Fowler
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Mark Fowler wrote: > Hi, I was wondering if anyone has any advice on using the FileCache > module. Ah! Got it. This is really bad...this is how it works More investigating shows these are relivant parts of the code sub cacheout_open { my $pack = caller(1);

Re: Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread Mark Fowler
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Simon Wistow wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:34:46AM +0100, Alex McLintock said: > > Is the consensus to use putty if you have to use ssh from Windows? > > YOU VILL CONFORM! That or the openssh port (e.g. using the one that comes budled with cygwin) Putty is more user

Re: Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread the hatter
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Alex McLintock wrote: > Is the consensus to use putty if you have to use ssh from Windows? Aside from the previously mentioned bit that you can't print directly through putty, then yes. It does ssh2, for starters, which meant I could finally disable ssh1 on my servers, can

RE: Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread Harper, Gareth
> -Original Message- > From: the hatter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 June 2002 11:36 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Windows SSH > > > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Alex McLintock wrote: > > > Is the consensus to use putty if you have to use ssh from Windows? > > Aside from the

Re: Windows SSH

2002-06-28 Thread Roger Burton West
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 10:35:58AM +, the hatter wrote: >On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Alex McLintock wrote: >> Is the consensus to use putty if you have to use ssh from Windows? >Aside from the previously mentioned bit that you can't print directly >through putty, then yes. The only reason I wasn't u