Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-23 Thread Earle Martin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:16:51AM +, Ian Brayshaw wrote: > > This whole self-teaching thing really isn't working out. Where can I hire > > someone patient for one-on-one Perl lessons, and how much will it cost me? > > Are you looking for a formal "Look! I got a certificate"-thing, or > someth

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-23 Thread Ian Brayshaw
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 03:13, Earle Martin wrote: > ...for a brain furnace that isn't working. > > This whole self-teaching thing really isn't working out. Where can I hire > someone patient for one-on-one Perl lessons, and how much will it cost me? Are you looking for a formal "Look! I got a cert

Stokers Required

2003-02-23 Thread Earle Martin
...for a brain furnace that isn't working. This whole self-teaching thing really isn't working out. Where can I hire someone patient for one-on-one Perl lessons, and how much will it cost me? -- mineral rate

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-23 Thread Paul Makepeace
> mail.srl.org pointing to where you want it. ... MX records are not cached > (ie have no TTL) so that should work almost instantly Oi reckons they do, $ host -v -t mx paulm.com | grep mail.realprogrammers.com$ paulm.com 258 IN MX 69 mail.realprogrammers.com $ host -

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-23 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Monday 24 February 2003 00:23, Paul Makepeace wrote: > So: recommendation, given what a *total* pain in the arse it's been > getting it deleted and changed, is not to register an SLD as a > nameserver. It's actually still there, so web & mail have been disrupted > for two weeks now. well you

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-23 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 11:53:28PM +, Mark Fowler wrote: > Changing nameserver whois record can be confusing, and many people helped > Paul Makepeace deconfudle (or more fuddle) the issue: > > http://london.pm.org/lpm/20030217/017031.html Hmm, while much appreciated it turned out no-one par

London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-23 Thread Mark Fowler
This is the weekly summary for the London.pm list for the week starting the 17th February 2003. There were only 79 messages this week. The first new thread of the week was started by Neil Fryer who was looking for advice on a good free (as in beer) MS Windows Perl IDE. No-one could suggest anyth

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-23 Thread Joshua Keroes
Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any modules on CPAN than can deal with Cron like repeating > dates in any (sensible) way. Sean Burke wrote this script that explains crontabs in plain English. It's a little orthagonal to what I suspect you're doing but may prove useful: http:/

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-23 Thread David Cantrell
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:06:53PM +, Simon Wistow wrote: > 2. Should I provide legacy get_word and get_dword (or read_(d)word) > which give back 32 ints. Or should give back a native word size and give > method to force an n-bit architecture (there's already a set_endian > method) Why not su

get/put or read/write

2003-02-23 Thread Simon Wistow
I've just finished rewriting File::Binary (my very first ever Perl module, aw) after three years (added better error checking, writing as well as reading, working signed integer support, support for big endian and little endian architectures and a Schwern pleasing ~2700 tests). Anyway, the ol

Re: Domain reseller survey

2003-02-23 Thread Lusercop
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:33:17AM +, alex wrote: > tucows do uk domains and so on, but i believe that you have to take a > cheesy test and run shonky perl. You don't have to run all of their shonky perl. We're going to be resellers for tucows soon (when I finish my coding), and most of the sh

Re: Domain reseller survey

2003-02-23 Thread alex
tucows do uk domains and so on, but i believe that you have to take a cheesy test and run shonky perl. -- alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> slab laboratories