On 11/02/2010 17:28, Richard Huxton wrote:
You already have an "id" attribute on the toggle links (e.g.
"toggler_1"). Add a class on each "tr": "depends_on_1" and then a couple
of lines of jquery or similar should let you toggle the rows on/off.
As per my previous response, complete with exampl
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:13:39PM +, Tom Hukins said:
> Has anyone made a self referential TV show yet where they follow a
> group of people trying to make a TV show?
Sports Night ('98-'00) and Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip ('06-'07) both
from Aaron "West Wing" Sorkin. In a similar vein to t
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Tom Hukins wrote:
Has anyone made a self referential TV show yet where they follow a
group of people trying to make a TV show?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_Wallpaper
--
bob walker
buses should be purple and bendy
On 11 February 2010 22:13, Tom Hukins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:57:31PM +, Peter Corlett wrote:
> > Rather bizarrely, I was pimpspammed about a "Head of Technology"
> > role at Endemol.
>
> "It's day one and the candidates have been asked about their five main
> strengths and weakne
On 11 Feb 2010, at 22:13, Tom Hukins wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:57:31PM +, Peter Corlett wrote:
>> Rather bizarrely, I was pimpspammed about a "Head of Technology" role at
>> Endemol.
> "It's day one and the candidates have been asked about their five main
> strengths and weaknesses.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:28:25PM +, Richard Huxton said:
> You already have an "id" attribute on the toggle links (e.g. "toggler_1").
> Add a class on each "tr": "depends_on_1" and then a couple of lines of
> jquery or similar should let you toggle the rows on/off.
I knocked this together
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:57:31PM +, Peter Corlett wrote:
> Rather bizarrely, I was pimpspammed about a "Head of Technology"
> role at Endemol.
"It's day one and the candidates have been asked about their five main
strengths and weaknesses..."
Has anyone made a self referential TV show yet w
On 12/02/2010, at 7:35 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:40:03AM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
>> On 12/02/2010, at 12:03 AM, James Laver wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:13:15PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
The job is in an absolutely beautiful part of the world
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 06:40:03AM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
> On 12/02/2010, at 12:03 AM, James Laver wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:13:15PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
> >>
> >> The job is in an absolutely beautiful part of the world with great food
> >> and just about the most benign
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:43:43PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> I don't think that a table is the only way to represent that data,
> unless you have particular accessibility concerns that require one. I'm
> not seeing anything in the html that suggests that though.
Must be accessible and readab
On 11 Feb 2010, at 10:10, Jacqui Caren-home wrote:
> The market must be picking up - I am getting "head hunted" again :-)
> Ok, I *know* its a trawl and a not very targetted one but the fact that
> the RA's are bothering to do trawls must mean things are picking up again.
I get loads of trawls, so
On 12/02/2010, at 12:03 AM, James Laver wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:13:15PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
>>
>> The job is in an absolutely beautiful part of the world with great food and
>> just about the most benign weather you could possibly imagine by the way.
>
> Albeit under an ant
On 11/2/10 17:25, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:02:07PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
On 11/2/10 16:28, David Cantrell wrote:
I assume that the reason is that people haven't bothered looking at the
site. Because if they did, they would see obviously tabular data.
You didn't ci
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 17:01, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> James Laver wrote:
>>
>> It's my single biggest source of spam. I get 419s all the time to it, job
>> ads and today spam from a loan company that will loan me up to a million
>> quid. Of course i'm likely to borrow a million quid off a spammer..
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:02:07PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On 11/2/10 16:28, David Cantrell wrote:
> >I assume that the reason is that people haven't bothered looking at the
> >site. Because if they did, they would see obviously tabular data.
> You didn't cite a link but I assume we're lookin
On 11/02/10 17:02, Simon Wilcox wrote:
On 11/2/10 16:28, David Cantrell wrote:
I assume that the reason is that people haven't bothered looking at the
site. Because if they did, they would see obviously tabular data.
You didn't cite a link but I assume we're looking at something like this:
h
On 11/2/10 16:28, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:07:41PM +, Jonathan Tweed wrote:
On 11 Feb 2010, at 13:40, David Cantrell wrote:
I'm going to be very rude to the next person to suggest something that
assumes I have a hierarchy of s instead of a .
Could it be that you're
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:07:41PM +, Jonathan Tweed wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2010, at 13:40, David Cantrell wrote:
> > I'm going to be very rude to the next person to suggest something that
> > assumes I have a hierarchy of s instead of a .
> Could it be that you're doing the wrong thing?
> Maybe it
James Laver wrote:
It's my single biggest source of spam. I get 419s all the time to it, job ads
and today spam from a loan company that will loan me up to a million quid. Of
course i'm likely to borrow a million quid off a spammer...
I would, just wouldn't pay it back :-)
Dirk
just to fill in some info, i have been working with this shop to find a
cto. i will tell the ceo this was a foolish move as it breaks the
rules. they are a legit outfit and the ceo actually seems to have a perl
clue. the perl test he sends out is unique, interesting and really tests
your skills in
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
> I thought something like that, too; the copy I got was addressed to my
> @cpan.org email address, which I don't actively give out, either.
It's my single biggest source of spam. I get 419s all the time to it, job ads
and today spam
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:58:07AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>> Snap..
>>
>> I got one of these as well. Wonder if that is coincidence :-)
>>
>> Perhaps we should ask whose mailing list he has managed to get hold of?
>
> It's scraped from sea
On 11 February 2010 13:40, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> I'm going to be very rude to the next person to suggest something that
> assumes I have a hierarchy of s instead of a .
Using and tags does not mean you need to have them display in
a bulleted list.
* ducks and runs*
--
Noli immiscere te drac
On 11 Feb 2010, at 13:40, David Cantrell wrote:
I'm going to be very rude to the next person to suggest something that
assumes I have a hierarchy of s instead of a .
Could it be that you're doing the wrong thing?
Maybe it keeps getting suggested for a reason...
Cheers
Jonathan
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:49:05PM +, Oliver Gorwits wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 14:25, David Cantrell wrote:
> > I want to add a Thingy to CPANdeps to let users collapse/expand portions
> > of the dependency tree. How would one go about this?
> > Naively wrapping s in s and toggling their style.di
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:13:15PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
>
> The job is in an absolutely beautiful part of the world with great food and
> just about the most benign weather you could possibly imagine by the way.
Albeit under an antiquated religious system with ridiculous laws that prop up
On 11 February 2010 11:13, Kieren Diment wrote:
> Mine came to my mailing lists address. The job is in an absolutely beautiful
> part of the world with great food and just about the most benign weather you
> could possibly imagine by the way. It's a shame I'm not in the market right
> now.
>
On 11/02/2010, at 10:00 PM, Mike Whitaker wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2010, at 10:58, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>
>> Snap..
>>
>> I got one of these as well. Wonder if that is coincidence :-)
>>
>> Perhaps we should ask whose mailing list he has managed to get hold of?
>
> Dunno, but, FWIW, mine was addr
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:58:07AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> Snap..
>
> I got one of these as well. Wonder if that is coincidence :-)
>
> Perhaps we should ask whose mailing list he has managed to get hold of?
It's scraped from search.cpan.org
(Or it's the publicly visible PAUSE e-mail addres
On 11 Feb 2010, at 10:58, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> Snap..
>
> I got one of these as well. Wonder if that is coincidence :-)
>
> Perhaps we should ask whose mailing list he has managed to get hold of?
Dunno, but, FWIW, mine was addressed to my IRC nick not my real first name.
--
Mike Whitaker|
Snap..
I got one of these as well. Wonder if that is coincidence :-)
Perhaps we should ask whose mailing list he has managed to get hold of?
Dirk
Jacqui Caren-home wrote:
The market must be picking up - I am getting "head hunted" again :-)
Ok, I *know* its a trawl and a not very targetted one
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Jacqui Caren-home
wrote:
> The market must be picking up - I am getting "head hunted" again :-)
> Ok, I *know* its a trawl and a not very targetted one but the fact that
> the RA's are bothering to do trawls must mean things are picking up again.
>
> I dont really
On 11/02/2010 10:10, Jacqui Caren-home wrote:
The market must be picking up - I am getting "head hunted" again :-)
I got the same email, it's like they think people within an industry /
skill set don't talk to each other :-)
regards,
Paul
The market must be picking up - I am getting "head hunted" again :-)
Ok, I *know* its a trawl and a not very targetted one but the fact that
the RA's are bothering to do trawls must mean things are picking up again.
I dont really fancy moving abroad - quite happy where I am - but I am
curious abo
34 matches
Mail list logo
