On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:19:05PM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> Je 2003-09-02 18:01:12 +0100, Ben skribis:
> > I mean, the RDA for vitamin C is only, what, 60 milligrams?
Right. That's the amount determined to stave off scurvy[1]. The RDA
doesn't say anything about if you should have more, or
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Clayton, Nik [IT] wrote:
> "One of the big themes for me was hearing the Perl guys wanting to help
> out everyone else, whether the other languages wanted them or not. That
> fits in with what's best described as the irrational exuberance of the
> Per
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:29:08AM -0800, john muth wrote:
>
> Yes! Two Boots is fantastic. Lordy but I miss decent
> pizza living in London.
If you're looking for a gastronomic tour of New York, then you must
visit Brooklyn for some pizza. There's a Two Boots in Brooklyn
(Park Slope, Brooklyn
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:54:37AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > http://jobs.perl.org/job/513
> >
> > And that's in San Jose, which is one of the most expensive places to
> > live in the USA - and has too much traffic to boot.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:24:42PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> The traditional restrictions on web usernames are things like only
> alphanumerics, and usually lowercase to reduce user confusion/burden
> remembering.
>
> I was wondering, why?
I think the restriction, at least in regards to low
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:49:33PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:21:15PM +0100, Shevek said:
> > I disagree entirely. This gives the impression that one should consciously
> > code from the book.
>
> Au Contraire. If you don't understand the pattern properly *then* you'
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:30:38PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:01:20PM -0600, Chris Devers wrote:
> > Over here, we're lucky enough to get Dan Sugalski giving talks on his
> > progress with Parrot most months, and it seems like things are going well.
> > I'm not count
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:31:10AM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
> "EARTH IN DANGER
> Asteroid on collision course
>
> Washington - A killer asteroid with a diameter of one kilometer and weighing
> 10'000 megatons[1] could crash into the earth on the 16th of March 2880.
Bummer. The SciFi channe
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 11:31:27PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
> BTW, that's why Rindolf isn't the solution: it's only Shlomi's dozen or so
> ideas of what Perl needs to become. Nothing wrong with most of those ideas and
> I hope he goes ahead with implementing them. *But* they don't cover what Si
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 06:19:37PM +, Dave Cross wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:54:08PM -0500, Adam Turoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Anyone see this month's edition of the Perl Review yet?
>
> Yep. Just finished reading it.
So, whacha think?
Anyone see this month's edition of the Perl Review yet?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:06:01PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, the hatter wrote:
> > Erm, if you restore an AI to the state it was in some time ago, why would
> > it be any more confused than when it was first in that state ? Unless
> > you're implying that some part of the
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:51:11PM -0800, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> I'm actually slightly surprised they don't push Python since that's
> their internal language preference for the crawler, which is a pretty
> sophisticated piece of code from what I've heard.
s/the crawler/prototypes/;
Guido menti
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 01:37:01PM -0800, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:20:30PM +, Chris Ball wrote:
> >http://www.google.com/programming-contest/
>
> Ah yes, the classic old "why put expensive clever people on the payroll
> when we can run a competition and for a mea
14 matches
Mail list logo
