Daniel Pittman wrote:
Philip Newton writes:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Dirk Koopman wrote:
Now, is there a reasonably reliable way of determining what we have, on a
string by string basis, to at least tell whether we are dealing with utf8
or iso-8859 (not caring which
Philip Newton writes:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>> Dirk Koopman wrote:
>>>
>>> Now, is there a reasonably reliable way of determining what we have, on a
>>> string by string basis, to at least tell whether we are dealing with utf8
>>> or iso-8859 (not caring which varia
Philip Newton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Dirk Koopman wrote:
Now, is there a reasonably reliable way of determining what we have, on a
string by string basis, to at least tell whether we are dealing with utf8 or
iso-8859 (not caring which variant) so that I can d
On 25 Sep 2009, at 10:09, Philip Newton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Dirk Koopman wrote:
Now, is there a reasonably reliable way of determining what we
have, on a
string by string basis, to at least tell whether we are dealing
with utf8 or
iso-8859 (not cari
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 09:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
> Dirk Koopman wrote:
>>
>> Now, is there a reasonably reliable way of determining what we have, on a
>> string by string basis, to at least tell whether we are dealing with utf8 or
>> iso-8859 (not caring which variant) so that I can drive Encode
Dirk Koopman wrote:
It appears that, with the increasing prevalence of 5.10, the usage of
utf8 or not is getting more picky.
I have a well established, networked, app that has upwards of 250 nodes
and about 4000 users at one time (on certain weekends double that) all
over the world. These use
It appears that, with the increasing prevalence of 5.10, the usage of
utf8 or not is getting more picky.
I have a well established, networked, app that has upwards of 250 nodes
and about 4000 users at one time (on certain weekends double that) all
over the world. These users are running mainly
