On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:46, Paul Mison wrote:
> On 26/11/2002 at 00:44 +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>
> >As a matter of interest, having just become a #london.pm virgin this
> >evening, why is [nearly] everybody op'd?
>
> So we can set the topic, mainly. And as mutually asssured destruction
> if
On 26/11/2002 at 00:44 +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
As a matter of interest, having just become a #london.pm virgin this
evening, why is [nearly] everybody op'd?
So we can set the topic, mainly. And as mutually asssured destruction
if anyone goes nuts.
Is the fact that a newbie isn't
an op part
> As a matter of interest, having just become a #london.pm virgin this
> evening, why is [nearly] everybody op'd? Is the fact that a newbie isn't
> an op part of the problem? What is going on here? [for the absence of
> FUD, this is an "I am interested" not a "why wasn't I IMMEDIATELY made
> op" fl
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 00:20, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:56:30PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> > The inaccuracies with people's perceived characters on the IRC channel
> > is the root of a problem typical of a lot of ``online social groups''.
> > The representations on IRC,
