x27;s tried out
Damian's Class::Contract, which looked like a staggeringly powerful way
of specifying OO structures & checking that they are being adhered to.
My main problem with it last time I looked was that it appeared that you
had to rebuild everything using C::C inheritence semantics
Tim Sweetman wrote:
> Q: How many OO Perl programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> A: HASH(0x870bf8)
Am I the only one who thinks that's really funny?
I was just about ROFLMAO :)
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > Q: How many OO Perl programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> > A: HASH(0x870bf8)
>
> Am I the only one who thinks that's really funny?
I found myself more concerned that it was an unblessed refere
Richard Clamp wrote:
> I found myself more concerned that it was an unblessed reference,
> and so not an object.
Yeah, there was that. But I figured that this way, he could get away with
not specifying exactly which class he was using (or you might get holy wars
à la "but lightbuls get changed mu
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Richard Clamp wrote:
> > Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > > Q: How many OO Perl programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> > > A: HASH(0x870bf8)
>
> I found myself more concerned that it was an unblessed reference, and
> so not an object. At that point the joke was ruined.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Richard Clamp wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > > Q: How many OO Perl programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> > > A: HASH(0x870bf8)
> >
> > Am I the only one who thinks that's really funny?
>
> I fo
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Richard Clamp wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:11:36PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > Tim Sweetman wrote:
> > > Q: How many OO Perl programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
> > > A: HASH(0x870bf8)
> >
> > Am I the only one who thinks that's really funny?
>
> I
