Merijn Broeren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote
> > Maybe you can ask the powers that be whether the ^=~ operator has a
> > name?
>
> I've already named it last year, and you just have to follow suit:
>
> the dragon operator
>
> See, it's a point headed dragon that breathes fire to the right.
>
Quoting Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:48:48AM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>
> > Some stuff has changed. We were in a guru session with Larry and
> > Damien about Apoc 4 earlier in the week[1] and they mentioned that
> > some stuff has changed. I can't remember o
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:05:18AM +, Robin wrote:
> Robin Houston wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:59:52AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Maybe you can ask the powers that be whether the ^=~ operator has a
> > > name?
> >
> > It's obviously a firework.
>
> what is ? ... oh .. that
Robin Houston wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:59:52AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Maybe you can ask the powers that be whether the ^=~ operator has a
> > name?
>
> It's obviously a firework.
what is ? ... oh .. that .. you mean the rat operator?
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:59:52AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Maybe you can ask the powers that be whether the ^=~ operator has a
> name?
It's obviously a firework.
.robin.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 02:48:48AM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> Some stuff has changed. We were in a guru session with Larry and
> Damien about Apoc 4 earlier in the week[1] and they mentioned that
> some stuff has changed. I can't remember off hand exactly all
> that's changed but just to giv
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 08:28:37PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
> As an aside, I wonder how much of the full design Larry has already?
> It's easy to see why each apocalypse takes a while to produce, and as
> far as I can see nothing has been retracted from any of the previous
> apocalypses.
Rule 2
