[Apologies for coming into this discussion so late]
On 10 Mar 2003 at 2:00, Dave Cross wrote:
From: Blackwell, Lee [IT] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/10/03 9:51:14 AM
first let me apologise, I know this mail will be
accompanied by an HTML version I don't know how to
prevent it. Outlook
Philip Newton has the answer?
Here's a very non-elegant, but effective (at least, it was for me),
workaround:
when you have an email message open, choose File | Properties
(or press
Alt+Enter), then sending options, then the Internet tab (if it
isn't already selected), then send
On 19 Mar 2003 at 14:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[sending attachments as UUEncoded to work around auto-HTML MSexChange
misfeature]
Well, I've tried that with this message...
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:34:39PM +, Jasper McCrea wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 04:04:54PM +, Jasper McCrea wrote:
If $_ isn't too big, the latter is probably more efficient. I said probably.
use Benchmark; # Recent experience with writing test
Jasper McCrea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree. Pub good. (But I'd rather spend the time breeding crabsticks)
That was an obscure reference to Harry Hill, for those who don't have
to suffer a flatmate with zany TV taste. OK, I have to admit it was
pretty funny...
first let me apologise, I know this mail will be accompanied by an
HTML version I don't know how to prevent it. Outlook swears I'm
using plain text but somehow it doesn't end up that way. So, sorry...
Outlook-Tools/Options/Mail format tab/Send in this message format = Plain
text
That's
From: Blackwell, Lee [IT] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/10/03 9:51:14 AM
first let me apologise, I know this mail will be
accompanied by an HTML version I don't know how to
prevent it. Outlook swears I'm using plain text but
somehow it doesn't end up that way. So, sorry...
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:21:19PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:10, Shevek wrote:
/g evaluated in a list context causes =~ to return a list of all bracketed
^^ note: no is
no no my pretty little vampire slayer ... its not the /g that
Title: RE: regrouping lines of STDIN - Outlook does what it wants
Thanks Lee,
Outlook-Tools/Options/Mail format tab/Send in this message
format = Plain
text
but no. This message is plain text by that method, enjoy...
Tom SW
Lusercop wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:21:19PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:10, Shevek wrote:
/g evaluated in a list context causes =~ to return a list of all bracketed
^^ note: no is
no no my pretty little vampire slayer ...
On Monday 10 March 2003 10:08, Lusercop wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 07:21:19PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:10, Shevek wrote:
/g evaluated in a list context causes =~ to return a list of all
bracketed
^^ note: no is
no no
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:07:16AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Lee,
Outlook-Tools/Options/Mail format tab/Send in this message
format = Plain
text
but no. This message is plain text by that method, enjoy...
It would seem that Outhouse is taking your send as Plain text to
Alternatively, we could run something like demime to strip out all
non-text/plain parts, but that will probably break PGP signing and
stuff.
No, as that's subtly different. The PGP signature is a normal attachment,
whereas html mail uses multipart/alternative etc to indicate that this is
an
Title: RE: regrouping lines of STDIN - Outlook does what it wants
Joel, reassuringly,
one... In other words, sending MIME-encoded mail with html
and plaintext
versions should just DTRT in most clients.
I'll stop apologising then. It still keeps me out of some mailing lists where I
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:33:48PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to David Cantrell's bemusement
Still, it's Lent, humility and no alchohol the order of the 40 days.
Are you sure you're on the right list?
o yes. You've all been very helpful. It's almost a shame I'm leaving for the
On Monday 10 March 2003 12:54, Lusercop wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:16:18AM +, Robin Szemeti wrote:
/g evaluated in a list context causes =~ to return a list of all
bracketed submatches. That's what causes =~ to have an appropriate
return value for assigning to a list lvalue.
On Monday 10 March 2003 13:31, Andrew Wilson wrote:
($foo) = 'foo boo moo' =~ /\w+/g;
print $foo\n;
foo
ahh ! .. now I have to confess I didn't know that! well well ... one lives
and learns.
--
Robin Szemeti
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:44:00AM +, Mark Fowler wrote:
People could always offer to help the Siesta project to get it to a state
where we could use it to run all the London.pm mail. Then doing things
like this is quite straight forward.
What does Siesta still need done in order to be
Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:24:43PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
while (STDIN) {
if (my ( $code ) = /$rxp/g) {
if ( my ($code) =~ /$rxp/g ) ... surely? ie, s/=/=~/
That's not a
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:24:43PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
while (STDIN) {
if (my ( $code ) = /$rxp/g) {
if ( my ($code) =~ /$rxp/g ) ... surely? ie, s/=/=~/
That's not a substution, it's assigning the result
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:24:43PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
while (STDIN) {
if (my ( $code ) = /$rxp/g) {
if ( my ($code) =~ /$rxp/g ) ... surely? ie,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:10:06PM +, Shevek wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:30:53PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:24:43PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
while (STDIN) {
if (my ( $code ) =
On Sunday 09 March 2003 15:10, Shevek wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
snip
my ($code) = $_ =~ /a (reg) ex/;
I'm not clear on the point of the /g though.
/g evaluated in a list context causes =~ to return a list of all bracketed
submatches. That's what causes =~ to have
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:59:41PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
it's a unicode character which likes buffy.
Is that sort of like a fictional character?
--
$x='4a75737420616e6f74686572205065726c'#Earle Martin
.'206861636b65720d0a';for(0..26){print #
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:03:33PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (%seen) {
^ values %seen is more likely what you want here.
It won't work with strict because I get Can't use string (AA) as an ARRAY
ref while strict refs in use. How do I use a proper array ref? Any
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:03:33PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello London.pm
first let me apologise, I know this mail will be accompanied by an HTML
version I don't know how to prevent it. Outlook swears I'm using plain
text but somehow it doesn't end up that way. So, sorry...
This
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:20:42PM +, Lusercop wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:03:33PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for (%seen) {
^ values %seen is more likely what you want here.
It won't work with strict because I get Can't use string (AA) as an ARRAY
ref
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:25:29PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Ahh, so that's what he meant. Yeah. AOL what mbm said /AOL
^^^
who's this mbm character?
:-)
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 2002
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:03 AM
Hello London.pm
first let me apologise, [...] an HTML version [...]
Don't worry about this.
funny Can anybody please send a
no-more-than-twenty-chars-HTML-filtering-perl-script to Mr. Schutzer?
Title: RE: regrouping lines of STDIN
Lusercop points out
for (%seen) {
^ values %seen is more likely what you want here.
Of course! I was far too caught up with making the array ref in the first place (well, it's exciting the first few times).
Thank you. Don't understand what he Joel
Title: RE: regrouping lines of STDIN - hashtable algorithm?
Hi Luis,
...
Looks like a hashtable algorithm... just curious. =-]
don't know what one of those is...
...
# First time for this array ref...
$seen{$code} = [ $_ ];
yup, [ ] was what I was looking for.
But I think I can do
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Lusercop wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:25:29PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Ahh, so that's what he meant. Yeah. AOL what mbm said /AOL
^^^
who's this mbm character?
Dunno, it displays as 3 characters on my screen.
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:47:36PM +, the hatter wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Lusercop wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:25:29PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
Ahh, so that's what he meant. Yeah. AOL what mbm said /AOL
^^^
who's this mbm
Title: RE: regrouping lines of STDIN
Dunno, it displays as 3 characters on my screen. Maybe mbm
is a funny
foreign multi-byte character that's sometimes difficult for
others to get
to grips with.
the hatter
yes, more sinned against than sinning, typo-wise,Wise,Wize,Weaz,usw
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:56:50PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think I can do this on the command-line with sort, somehow, all I want
to do is sort on the 24th to 26th character of every line, instead of the
whole thing.
sort +.23 -25
(character numbering starts at 0)
Roger
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:24:43PM +, Joel Bernstein wrote:
while (STDIN) {
if (my ( $code ) = /$rxp/g) {
if ( my ($code) =~ /$rxp/g ) ... surely? ie, s/=/=~/
That's not a substution, it's assigning the result of the pattern match
to $code. /$rxp/g is matching against $_ not
TSchutzerWeissmann == TSchutzerWeissmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TSchutzerWeissmann Hi Luis,
TSchutzerWeissmann ...
Looks like a hashtable algorithm... just curious. =-]
TSchutzerWeissmann don't know what one of those is...
TSchutzerWeissmann ...
# First time for this array ref...
Luis == Luis Campos de Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Luis # I think you should rewrite this:
Luis # push @{ $seen{$code} } , $_;
Luis # Like this:
Luis if( exists $seen{$code} ){
Luis # I already used this array ref...
Luis push @{
38 matches
Mail list logo
