David Cantrell wrote:
> A shitty old Tseng ISA card would be sufficient.
Oooh. Fond memories.
My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:46PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
> My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
Lucky bastard. My first computer did 80x25 :-)
A
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Andy Wardley wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:46PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
>
> Lucky bastard. My first computer did 80x25 :-)
My first computer still does 40x25 (unless you counted the quarter-block
'gra
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Newton, Philip wrote:
> David Cantrell wrote:
> > A shitty old Tseng ISA card would be sufficient.
>
> Oooh. Fond memories.
>
> My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
>
My first computer had LEDs
/J\
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
> My first computer had LEDs
This 'ere puter has five LEDs. FIVE. Bloody luxury!
--
David Cantrell|Degenerate
On Wed, 15 May 2002, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:38PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > > My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
> > My first computer had LEDs
>
> This 'ere puter has five LEDs. FIVE.
Andy Wardley wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:29:46PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
> > My first computer had an ET4000 which I ran at 800x600.
>
> Lucky bastard. My first computer did 80x25 :-)
Well, OK. I should have qualified that with "my first peecee".
My first computer did 40x25 "nativ
