On 26 Jan 2002 06:33:14 -0800, (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
> > "Newton," == Newton, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Newton,> Ouch. Was it that badly misaligned in the Google result, or did
> Newton,> your mailer mangle it?
>
> It looked perfectly aligned to me.
Viewing the message in a
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Newton, Philip ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > In which case, I suppose my point is "no steenking tabs"[*] in ASCII art.
> >
>
> so you are saying that tabs in code are also bad? ;-)
>
Yep, or rather I am.
However avoid doing :
:1,$s/^I/ /
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Harry Barman wrote:
> > Yes, I also remember that comment. I really should have kept
> > a copy of just the comment. Luckily through the magic of
> > google here it is!
> >
> >
> >
> > /-\
> > /
* Newton, Philip ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> In which case, I suppose my point is "no steenking tabs"[*] in ASCII art.
>
so you are saying that tabs in code are also bad? ;-)
or have we already had this holy war this week ;-)
--
Greg McCarroll http://217.34
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "Newton," == Newton, Philip
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Newton,> Phi "always use a monospace font for posting ASCII art" lip
>
> And I use monospace font for reading email. Your point?
Mea culpa. Apparently, my MUA uses 6 character increments for tabs.
> "Newton," == Newton, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Newton,> Ouch. Was it that badly misaligned in the Google result, or did your mailer
Newton,> mangle it?
It looked perfectly aligned to me.
Newton,> Phi "always use a monospace font for posting ASCII art" lip
And I use monospace fon
Harry Barman wrote:
> Yes, I also remember that comment. I really should have kept
> a copy of just the comment. Luckily through the magic of
> google here it is!
>
>
>
>/-\
> / \
> /
Original message
>Date: 25 Jan 2002 06:50:19 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz)
>Subject: Re: Who invented Emacs?
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
...
>Yes. And I've seen the source. There's a big section with
a big
>ASCII-graphics death
> "Newton," == Newton, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Newton,> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> My first exposure to emacs on Unix was "gosling emacs".
Newton,> Did you ever hear it called "GOSMACS"?
Yes. And I've seen the source. There's a big section with a big
ASCII-graphics death-head
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My first exposure to emacs on Unix was "gosling emacs".
Did you ever hear it called "GOSMACS"?
Related links:
* http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/EMACS.html
* http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/GOSMACS.html
* http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jonathan> Hmmm, so Gosling re-wrote emacs in C, ported it to Unix, and then
Jonathan> watched while Stallman removed all his code for copyright reasons. lol.
Jonathan> Still, claiming to have done "the original Unix Emacs editor"
I just read an article where Gosling frantically tries to explain why C#
is not a threat and Java is still the best thing since sliced bread. He
also claims that he invented Emacs. Is this true? I always thought it
was Stallman, but let's face it Stallman would be happy to forget to
mention it if
12 matches
Mail list logo