Kate L Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have
>> something to say?
anathema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any chance you could ralise that this would dam london.pm
> to a tiny little trickle?
You're claiming that the amount of
Kate L Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have
>something to say?
Is there any chance you could ralise that this would dam london.pm to a tiny
little trickle?
>since they subscribe, see several inane one-liners, unsubscribe, and
>then co
David H. Adler wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 07:55:09AM +, Dave Cross wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:04:02PM -, Tim Noll wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm
On Thu 21 Feb 2002, anathema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *bounce*
Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have
something to say? I've stopped recommending this list to people now,
since they subscribe, see several inane one-liners, unsubscribe, and
then complain that I was t
David H. Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does he beat us if we're Bad?
>Only if you ask nicely.
*bounce*
--
http://www.the-anathema.org
"What if everything is an illusion and nothing exists? In that case, I
definitely overpaid for my carpet." - Woody Allen
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:00:07PM -0500, anathema wrote:
> David H. Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Fortunately, no. We don't have a democratically elected leader, we have
> >a Ruthless, Godless Dictator(tm). :-)
>
> Does he beat us if we're Bad?
Only if you ask nicely.
dha
--
David H. Ad
David H. Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Fortunately, no. We don't have a democratically elected leader, we have
>a Ruthless, Godless Dictator(tm). :-)
Does he beat us if we're Bad?
--
http://www.the-anathema.org
"The two most beautiful words in the english language are 'check
enclosed'." - Dor
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:17:55AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
>
> > And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting,
> > right? :-)
> >
> > Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first...
>
> Hey
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:59:38PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Beware -- in Amsterdam, there were people who were willing to bid on "Sunday
> morning 10:00 am" as the meeting date for London.pm!
At least it was as late as 10am! :)
--
Natalie Ford .. [EMAIL PR
We'd just arive a few (20?) hours early.
Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: Newton, Philip [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 February 2002 14:00
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs
>
>
> Be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:59:38PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> Struan Donald wrote:
> > and thus started the great "monger meeting date unification" drive
> > of 2002 ;)
>
> Beware -- in Amsterdam, there were people who were willing to bid on "Sunday
> morning 10:00 am" as the meeting date fo
Struan Donald wrote:
> * at 21/02 11:17 + Nicholas Clark said:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> >
> > > And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an
> > > NY.pm meeting, right? :-)
> > >
> > > Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one fi
* at 21/02 11:17 + Nicholas Clark said:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
>
> > And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting,
> > right? :-)
> >
> > Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first...
>
> Hey cool. So they don't
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote:
> And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting,
> right? :-)
>
> Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first...
Hey cool. So they don't have a regular date. Does that mean that at the
auction at Y
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:04:02PM -, Tim Noll wrote:
>
> And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two
> weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag some
> of my hapless colleagues along, I might just try to avoid that teaspoon
> mauling.
An
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Mike Jarvis wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:04, Tim Noll wrote:
>
>> And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two
>> weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag
>> some
>> of my hapless colleagues
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:04, Tim Noll wrote:
> And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two
> weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag some
> of my hapless colleagues along, I might just try to avoid that teaspoon
> mauling.
They've gotten wo
David Cantrell wrote:
> > 2) What are the best / closest Perl or Perlish conferences taking
place
> > in Europe this year? I'm aware of YAPC::Europe, but are there going
to
> > be any in London or the UK? I'm trying to find a good one for me
and/or
> > my colleagues to attend.
>
> Other than GPW (
18 matches
Mail list logo
