Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-24 Thread Kate L Pugh
Kate L Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have something to say? anathema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any chance you could ralise that this would dam london.pm to a tiny little trickle? You're claiming that the amount of

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting, right? :-) Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first... Hey cool. So they don't have a regular date. Does that mean that at the auction at

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Newton, Philip
Struan Donald wrote: * at 21/02 11:17 + Nicholas Clark said: On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting, right? :-) Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first... Hey

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:59:38PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: Struan Donald wrote: and thus started the great monger meeting date unification drive of 2002 ;) Beware -- in Amsterdam, there were people who were willing to bid on Sunday morning 10:00 am as the meeting date for

RE: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Richard Clyne
We'd just arive a few (20?) hours early. Richard -Original Message- From: Newton, Philip [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 February 2002 14:00 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs Beware -- in Amsterdam, there were people who were

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Natalie Ford
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:59:38PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: Beware -- in Amsterdam, there were people who were willing to bid on Sunday morning 10:00 am as the meeting date for London.pm! At least it was as late as 10am! :) -- Natalie Ford .. [EMAIL

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread David H. Adler
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:17:55AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler wrote: And, of course, while you're here, you *will* come to an NY.pm meeting, right? :-) Of course, I'd have to actually *scedule* one first... Hey cool. So

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread anathema
David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fortunately, no. We don't have a democratically elected leader, we have a Ruthless, Godless Dictator(tm). :-) Does he beat us if we're Bad? -- http://www.the-anathema.org The two most beautiful words in the english language are 'check enclosed'. - Dorothy

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread anathema
David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does he beat us if we're Bad? Only if you ask nicely. *bounce* -- http://www.the-anathema.org What if everything is an illusion and nothing exists? In that case, I definitely overpaid for my carpet. - Woody Allen

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Kate L Pugh
On Thu 21 Feb 2002, anathema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *bounce* Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have something to say? I've stopped recommending this list to people now, since they subscribe, see several inane one-liners, unsubscribe, and then complain that I was

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread Tim Noll
David H. Adler wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 07:55:09AM +, Dave Cross wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:11:49AM -0500, David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:04:02PM -, Tim Noll wrote: And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-21 Thread anathema
Kate L Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any chance people could try to only post when they have something to say? Is there any chance you could ralise that this would dam london.pm to a tiny little trickle? since they subscribe, see several inane one-liners, unsubscribe, and then

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-20 Thread David H. Adler
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:04:02PM -, Tim Noll wrote: And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag some of my hapless colleagues along, I might just try to avoid that teaspoon mauling. And,

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-15 Thread James A Duncan
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Mike Jarvis wrote: On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:04, Tim Noll wrote: And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag some of my hapless colleagues along, I

Re: london.pm digest, Vol 1 #611 - 24 msgs

2002-02-14 Thread Mike Jarvis
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:04, Tim Noll wrote: And, as far as the london.pm meetings go, I'm off to the States for two weeks starting tomorrow. But when I return, if I can manage to drag some of my hapless colleagues along, I might just try to avoid that teaspoon mauling. They've gotten